User talk:Tampico1

Welcome!

Hello, Tampico1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tutorial to help get you oriented editing Wikipedia)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! Conifer (talk) 11:50, 25 June 2015 (UTC) Conifer (talk) 11:50, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aurora Prince, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 22:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help From Anyone Available!!!

Hi to anyone reading this :-). This is User: Tampico1. I very recently made this account in order to enjoy all the fun and privileges of editing Wikipedia!!! However, I'm having some trouble making Talk pages, editing and replying to other users' comments at the moment. Whenever I make any kind of New Section, Edit, or Talk Page, it seems to get "reverted", effectively removing the change that I made. Next to each revert displays a message in Capital letters stating "Block Evasion". The revert seems to be done automatically by an account entitled "Keri". I have posted on the Talk Page for "Keri" to ask for help with this, but have not gotten a response yet. Is anyone else who knows Wikipedia well available to talk on here with me about this and explain how to correct the edits or improve them so that they don't get reverted? Thanks so much to anyone who can help with this!!! :-) Tampico1 (talk) 18:08, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tampico1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting to please be unblocked, as the accusation that this account is a Sock Puppet is false and contains no evidence except suspicion. Attempts to communicate with the accusers and instigators of the Sock Puppet investigation were not met and the block was made very hastily and in spite of only circumstantial evidence. No vandalism or controversial edits were made by this account. This is the only account I have ever made and the users of the other accounts are not known to me. All requests to engage in civil conversation with the Administrators concerned were unduly ignored. Please give this request full attention and look over edits made by this account. Tampico1 (talk) 19:56, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I did look over your contributions. The behavioural evidence for sockpuppetry is overwhelming. Huon (talk) 02:12, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Huon and thanks for getting back to me. Can I politely ask what you mean by "behavioural evidence"? As far as I can tell, the term sockpuppetry means making accounts in order to vandalise pages - neither of which were actually done. Thanks, Tampico1 (talk) 04:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tampico1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please review the block. As far as I can see, no evidence exists for any vandalism from this account. In addition, no evidence exists for creation of multiple accounts. If there is anything anyone believes to be evidence for either of these things, please post them here so I can see for myself what you are referring to. Thanks for your co-operation.

Decline reason:

If you are not a sockpuppet, can you please explain why your account has done very little besides repeating the exact same edits that Aurora Prince's sockpuppets have been making in the last few weeks? Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:08, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Yunshui - Just had another look at the Aurora Prince page and can see so far only one edit that user made that may be similar to mine - the edit concerning birthplace of Interpol Paul Banks, I think you mean. There was a reference on there at one point to a online birth record which had his birthplace listed as Colchester, rather than Clacton, and this point came up a few times in a fan forum I belong to and possibly other places. The citation for his birth record is no longer there, so presumably that is no longer an issue. If there are other edits you are referring to, I can't find them personally so if you point them out to me that would be helpful. And the reason my account hasn't done much is because all of my edits were undone and then I got blocked!!! I honestly think that if you are able to see the edits that I made before my account got blocked, you will be able to see that they are good-faith edits and not vandalism. Not suggesting I may not have made a few rookie mistakes, but every one of them was for the good of the page and in the interests of bringing them up to a good standard (ie. removing unsourced content, adding in new citations, starting Talk pages to discuss contentious points). Please respond when you can. Thanks. Tampico1 (talk) 19:51, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be forgetting the edits you also made as Basic Bicycle, The Probability Wizard, ArielNow, 4TheSol and Sera Nowitzki. Keri (talk) 23:54, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input Keri, but once again, these fanciful ideas are 100% in your ow mind. Not only do you have absolutely nothing in the way of convincing evidence to back up these bizarre delusions, but your continued preoccupation with pressing this absurdist non-agenda that you have is bordering on the worrying. I sincerely hope you get some respite soon, Keri - it seems very much as though you need it (the behavioural evidence for this is overwhelming). In the meantime, can I very kindly suggest that you try and get yourself a life? Preferably one that doesn't involve internet stalking people... :-) All the best, Tampico1 (talk) 02:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For The Attention of User: NeilN

Hi there NeilN. I just received your notification about the Block placed on my account with the given reason as "Sock Puppet". I have read the page on what the term means and think a misunderstanding must have occurred. My account "Tampico1" is my only account, and not a Sock Puppet of "Aurora Prince" or any other user.

If you could please take the time to read through the Changes and Talk Pages that I created, I hope that will help. None of them were intentionally made to vandalise any page, and if that is how they were perceived, I would really appreciate an explanation as to how to improve them.

I attempted to contact User: "Keri" about this before, but did not get an explanation. As I stated before, this account (Tampico1) is most certainly not a Sock Puppet of User: "Aurora Prince". In fact, I do not even know the person that account belongs to. My account here is for editing pages in a helpful manner and I have made every effort to contact the Users who believed it to be a bad account.

Could you possibly contact the User "Aurora Prince" to ask them to confirm that "Tampico1" is not a Sock Puppet of their account(s)? I can't see any contact details for them and obviously can't make Talk Pages at the moment.

If not, could you please let me know where I need to go or who to contact in order to get this misunderstanding cleared up. I have not made the Block Appeal page yet, as the instructions advised me to contact you first. Please could you respond to this message as soon as possible! Thank you so much :-) Tampico1 (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is ample evidence you are a sockpuppet. You will need to appeal your block to convince another admin otherwise. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:49, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You may wish to peruse the Standard Offer; I'm putting this on the page of this account, because I'm assuming this is the one you are most likely to be reading today. But you should address the problems that have brought us to this point using the Aurora Prince account and page. Just creating another account tomorrow, and repeating the behaviour that led to the indefinite block all over again, only increases the difficulty you face in regaining the trust of the community here. Keri (talk) 20:23, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not Aurora Prince!!! Will have to take this matter much higher up now, I'm afraid. Tampico1 (talk) 20:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with that. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 20:53, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]