User talk:Tetrahedron17

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Tetrahedron17. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

L235 Thank you! And thanks for confirming me.

Tetrahedron17 (talk) 18:18, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tetrahedron17, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tetrahedron17! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding a link to the source page and the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.S Philbrick (Talk) 12:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise; I'll keep that in mind in the future. Thanks. Tetrahedron17 (talk) 12:34, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I had to delete the same content in the source article as it wasn't relevant. Do I need to additionally write something specific in the edit summary for such cases? Tetrahedron17 (talk) 12:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No just try to write an ES you think other people will understand. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thing about ping

Obscure piece of WP-lore coming you're way: This [1] doesn't work. For whatever reason, a successful ping must have that template and a WP:SIGN in the same published edit, or else it doesn't "go through". Can be read about at WP:PINGFIX. I said it was obscure. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh.

Thanks, will keep in mind. Tetrahedron17 (talk) 16:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gråbergs Gråa Sång

Tetrahedron17 (talk) 16:16, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, that worked. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

四面佛本身有什麼想要傳遞與表達的呢？我們知道您的情緒反應很激烈，我們與此人都很努力去讓系統與生態都能順利完成學業與任務，辛苦了

四面佛謝謝您能為了一切，保有珍貴的情感和慾望，那是您的愛，我們知道您的工作非常難以言喻，此人對於傷害與無知，也要在一步一腳印的方式下，克服時間與空間以及種種各式各樣的難題與考驗，若您認同我與我的家人，請讓情緒體能夠與我連結，或是您若不嫌棄，我想跟你一樣管理與平衡情緒與人類需要懂得如何去愛的力量。祝福一切。 TWLeewu (talk) 23:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TWLeewu I'm sorry, I can't understand what you're trying to say. Do have an issue with my edits on this article? Tetrahedron17 (talk) 05:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Erwadi

Apparently serial reverters are back, we'll see what happens. I asked for protection at WP:RFP. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gråbergs Gråa Sång Thanks... I didn't even know smaller articles could be nominated for protection. Tetrahedron17 (talk) 17:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Smaller article? Depends on which version you're looking at ;-) But afaik, size doesn't matter. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:50, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gråbergs Gråa Sång yeah, haha. though i meant, articles of lesser importance, that have lesser traffic and so on. like i bet this one has had more edits and people looking it up. Tetrahedron17 (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It may be declined as "to little for now" but asking is cheap. Happily, there seems to be a few watchers. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gråbergs Gråa Sång Do you think this could be reasonably nominated? It gets edited by IP's now and then, adding unreferenced stuff in an article that's already very poorly cited. Not very frequently, though. Tetrahedron17 (talk) 18:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think they're unwilling to issue longer protection unless it's more frequent/obviously bad faith stuff. Bishonen, would you care to comment? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would rather have blocked the character who keeps adding the unreferenced text dump, but it looks like they have access to several IPs. I've semiprotected the article for 2 weeks. Bishonen | tålk 19:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

And PS, Tetrahedron17, in a way articles with less traffic have more need of protection. But I don't think I'm ready to protect Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology. Bishonen | tålk 19:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ritviz

Hello, Tetrahedron17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ritviz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

學術自由的人

請問喜怒哀樂四種情緒表達方式整個誤導，請說明為何？你處於四次元空間，有必要把真實狀況吐露出來，可以的話讓我用我的技術幫助妳與你們。 TWLeewu (talk) 06:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]