User talk:Tevin27

Italic text wat up yall

List of best-selling music artists

Can you please explain, what exactly are you trying to do on the list ? Vorash 17:09, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Lopez actually sold 35 million so I tried to put it in. because the list says she sold 33 so i had to put.

But why did you remove Cranberries ? Vorash 17:21, 15 July 2005 (UTC) I hate them[reply]

what you want me to say ? :) Vorash 00:19, 17 July 2005 (UTC) do u like J.LO r u a fan[reply]

pics

I like the pic that you uploaded for the Beyoncé article, its really sexy, but do you think it is a very appropriate photo to head her biography? Why dont we find a more dignified photo and put yours further down in the article. u ok with this?

I also noticed that you kind of uploaded it over my photo. Im not accusing, but could you please check that your photo does not have the same name as one already uploaded in the encyclopedia, this might cause minor discrepancy.

By the way, do you happen to remember the source from which the pic was downloaded? If you do, thatd be great. Thanks man.

By the way, you said that your octave range was A2-E6; thats only 3 octaves and 5 notes, not 4+ octaves. Just thought Id let you know :) Journalist 02:30, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but it's not about how high my note is. it's the range that i can go. my longest note is 18 seconds

I reiterate, could you PLEASE make sure that you DO NOT upload photos over ones that other people have already uploaded? Its ill mannered. Thank you

Journalist 04:32, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cite source(s) when adding vocal profiles

If you would not mind, please WP:CITE source(s) when adding vocal profiles to articles-- otherwise, your contributions may be reverted. Hall Monitor 20:41, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is my second request asking you to please WP:CITE source(s) when making changes to vocalist articles. Hall Monitor 16:42, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell is your figging problemo. just fix Beyoncé's vocal prfoile then i'll be happy, Fix the damn problemo mecri, please.

This message is regarding the page Bow Wow. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Yamla 23:44, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for citing your source. Please remember to do that whenever you change any information. Thanks. --Yamla 00:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, everyone must cite information, including me. --Yamla 01:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tevin

I have placed a tag on the article Tevin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. I did this because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person but it does not indicate how or why that person is notable. If the person really is notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly to indicate why, and also put a note on Talk:Tevin. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles.

Don't write your own biography, is the rule. – Fudoreaper 01:26, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Hi. Just wanted to let you know that some anon user has made 120+ edits to your userpage for the past three days. If it is you, it'd be nice if you could mention it in the summary edit, so others won't have to wonder if it's a vandal or not... Bjelleklang - talk 00:08, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cited information

Please do not change cited information, such as what you did on the Bow Wow page, without citing your change. This is generally considered vandalism. You may well (in fact, probably are) right in this case but you must still WP:CITE your change. For now, I have reverted it. --Yamla 05:16, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ditto for Check On It -- getcrunk juice ^contribs 18:22, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the page Bow Wow. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've been warned repeatedly. --Yamla 04:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

R U FUCKING CRAZY, HE DID MOVE UP THE CHARTS I DUNNOT POST FALSE THINGS, U GOT ISSUES --unsigned comments from Tevin27 on my talk page

But you didn't cite the information, as you have been requested over and over again. cite cite cite. If you don't cite your changes, they are reverted. --Yamla 19:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If I may echo the requests made above, please stop adding uncited information to Wikipedia, it may be construed as vandalism if you continue to ignore these requests. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Run It!

Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Tables for charts, hash symbols are redundant when used before chart positions in chart tables as readers will already know that the numbers represent chart positions, and number ones shouldn't be bolded as it implies POV. Extraordinary Machine 22:52, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above comments applies for Alicia Keys as well. Please make sure that your edits are in unison with Wikipedia's style guidelines. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 23:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this is mind while editing. Thanks, --NaconKantari 02:25, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

redirecting disambiguation pages

Please don't turn disambiguation pages into redirect pages as with DC3. It causes problems which results in wikilinks being redirected to completely unrelated articles. Disambiguation pages by their nature are linked to by a range of different subjects. What would be better would be to click on 'what links here' (in the box on the left hand side) and go to the related articles and change the wikilinks there so that they do go to the right place. Otherwise you get articles about airlines linking to articles about pop groups when in fact they mean to link to articles about airplanes. Please leave a note on my talk page if you want to discuss. Thanks. -- Adz 11:34, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stay1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stay1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 07:15, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Link spam

This message is regarding the page Bow Wow. Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. Note that Wikipedia may see print or DVD publication, so we want more content, not more web links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Yamla 05:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia, as you did in Bow Wow. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Jkelly 23:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's A Thug In My Life

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. (aeropagitica) (talk) 06:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Sturken

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Carl Sturken, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 05:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Malaine

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Malaine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Addhoc 22:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:LovingThatYouWant.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LovingThatYouWant.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]