User talk:TheBigYES

September 2020

Hello, I'm Joseywales1961. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Clamshell design—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. JW 1961 Talk 21:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Succ. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Dylsss (talk) 21:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia and trigger the edit filter, as you did at Succ, you may be blocked from editing. JW 1961 Talk 21:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per WP:AIV. EdJohnston (talk) 22:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheBigYES (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i was just messing around and i wasnt thinking, but i realized what i did was wrong and i am gonna change my ways TheBigYES (talk) 15:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No response in 10 days'; hasn't shown clear understanding of actions that led to blocking only (talk) 01:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What constructive contributions do you want to make? 331dot (talk) 19:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:TheBigYES/sandbox

User:TheBigYES/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheBigYES/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TheBigYES/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JW 1961 Talk 18:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

this.

i'm sorry, i just wanna be unbanned.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheBigYES (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

ok, so to be honest, i was testing the security of this place, because my teachers told me it *wasn't* a reliable source. TheBigYES (talk) 20:46, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We already know that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. We could have told you this had you asked us, if you didn't believe your teachers when they told you. Please tell what constructive contributions you wish to make if unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 00:29, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheBigYES (talk) 16:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC) my contributions would be editing the Hegesistratus Wikipedia page, because it isn't that clear on info, and such. I want to help with small pages with little info

You are blocked, not banned. (Blocks and bans are different) You need to make another unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 17:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

TheBigYES (talk) 17:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC) oh. ok.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheBigYES (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

my contributions would be editing the Hegesistratus Wikipedia page, because it isn't that clear on info, and such. I want to help with small pages with little info TheBigYES (talk) 11:17 am, 3 March 2021, last Wednesday (7 days ago) (UTC−6)

Decline reason:

Given your editing history and prior unblock requests, I find this appeal unconvincing. I think your best chance of being unblocked is to wait 6 months and then ask for the standard offer _signed, Rosguill ^talk 06:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.