User talk:TheChunky/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:TheChunky. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
New pages patrol newsletter
Hello TheChunky,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, TheChunky. Thank you for your work on Mela Pat. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good work on the article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 14:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you @DreamRimmer . ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 15:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| keep on editing and being great! YOU ROCk!! :) Babysharkboss2 was here!! 19:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC) |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, TheChunky. Thank you for your work on Bhagwa Love Trap conspiracy theory. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:17, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Tagging pages for deletion
Hello, TheChunky,
When tagging pages for speedy deletion, please use Twinkle and select among possible CSD criteria the one that you think applies to the page you are tagging. Do not type in your own reasons or the page falls into the "Unspecified reason" CSD category and then tend to fall to the bottom of the categories that patrolling admins check. You should select among agreed-upon and limited CSD criteria and it can help to regularly review CSD so that you are very familiar with the criteria and when the apply. Even if you believe you know the criteria, it can always help to review them often. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:36, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
New page patrolling
Hi, TheChunky. Please note that soft redirects, such as Rattle his cage, are not eligible for A-series speedy deletion. It's a bit concerning that a new page reviewer would not know that, especially given that the soft redirect was created by an established user as the result of an RfD, and especially given that the two most recent sections on your talkpage are concerns about new-page-patrolling by two other administrators. We all make mistakes, but this pattern may be a sign that it's time to slow down, refamiliarize yourself with applicable policies and guidelines, and work to look before you leap when you encounter novel situations. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|she) 22:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. Will be careful for the future. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 22:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Draftifying
Hello TheChunky -- I think you are going overboard with moving articles to draft. It should only be done where there are genuine reasons why the article cannot be in mainspace without immediate improvement, usually for BLPs. I have moved some back. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. @Espresso Addict, I move the articles to draft per WP: DRAFTIFY, when I see there is lots of grammar and tone issues with notability issue and especially when there is no citations. Thank you. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 04:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Drafting is essentially deletion unless the creator is extremely clued up and persistent (ie often paid). It really shouldn't be done unless it would be a snow delete at AfD (and often AfD is preferable) or there are significant BLP issues. Espresso Addict (talk)
- Okay @Espresso Addict, thanks for enhancing my knowledge. I will consider this in my future actions.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Espresso Addict Can you check this edit . I've actually moved this article to the draft. However, I'm questioning the validity of the reason provided by the user for moving it back to the mainspace. Since I prefer to avoid edit wars, I've left it for other editors to handle. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's probably fine. The article looks like a translation of the German article, which often causes problems with sources as they don't use inline citations. I suspect the creator doesn't have English as their first language, hence the somewhat odd edit summary. I'll ask them about the translation. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Espresso Addict hmm. The German version is without any citation. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's probably fine. The article looks like a translation of the German article, which often causes problems with sources as they don't use inline citations. I suspect the creator doesn't have English as their first language, hence the somewhat odd edit summary. I'll ask them about the translation. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Drafting is essentially deletion unless the creator is extremely clued up and persistent (ie often paid). It really shouldn't be done unless it would be a snow delete at AfD (and often AfD is preferable) or there are significant BLP issues. Espresso Addict (talk)
- On this subject, you moved 2nd Group CIS to Draft space even though it had just been draftified earlier. Draftification is sometimes appropriate with recently created article once. If an editor moves it back to main space, then it is time to look for other solutions like improving the article yourself, tagging the article for any problems it contains or using one of Wikipedia's deletion processes if the article is irredeemably unsuitable. But don't get into a move war by repeating a draftification. Just check the page history first. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- Okay @Liz. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Dear Chunky,
You also wanted more footnotes (inline citations) for this general, a good request of course. I have added a number, can you take a look if its alright now? Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 09:51, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Dear Chunky,
Thank you for your interest in this article. You reasonably asked for more references, so i have supplied a number of them.
- Are you satisfied?
Thanks for a fresh look at this piece, cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 09:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Hansmuller, thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, I believe you should read WP:IC to learn how to add inline citations and understand their importance. Additionally, there is a written like an essay tag on the article. It needs to follow Wikipedia's writing format as outlined in WP:TONE. Thanks. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 10:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
November Articles for creation backlog drive
Hello TheChunky:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Discord invite
Hey there. Congrats on being on the backlog drive leaderboard. I really appreciate you helping out at NPP. If you want to hang out with other NPPs, consider joining us on the NPP Discord. Discord is live text chat software that can be really fun. If not no worries. Thanks and see you around :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Points award
|
Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
| This award is given to TheChunky for collecting more than 200 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:47, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Request for New page review
Hi @TheChunky, I understand that the review process is tedious and can take some time, but I was wondering if you could review Project Shivalik. I have planned to write articles about projects of Border Roads Organisation.
Other articles by me (unrelated to BRO as well) have been expeditely reviewed within a week, but this one for some reason isn't getting reviewed. I am eager to get this article reviewed so that it gets indexed by search engines. Thanks Leoneix (talk) 14:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. signed, Rosguill talk 19:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
Nomination of Harvinder Singh (IAS officer) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvinder Singh (IAS officer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello TheChunky, I don't see anything that makes this person notable, noticeable, famous or popular. So, I have to ask, how did you come to know of him? I am also concerned about Ehsan Roohi that you accepted in this state which is not great, and am curious whether you keep an eye on your acceptances, especially when they have a history as troublesome as that article's because it has only gotten worse since your acceptance. Among other things, the SPA has resorted to IPSOCKing to revert attempts to address some of the issues. Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Usedtobecool Hi, I have added a comment about this Harvinder Singh (IAS officer) article on AfD, your question's answer is there. Regarding the Ehsan Roohi, I have replied in detail at this place ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 14:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Chunky, this is all very disappointing. Drmies (talk) 17:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- I am dismayed by the unwarranted association of my account with an individual whom I have no personal acquaintance with. The CheckUser (CU) process has affirmed the existence of various accounts linked to mine, an association that remains perplexing to me. Despite my efforts to understand the rationale behind this situation, it appears that my explanations are met with skepticism. I wish to emphasize that the shared use of similar IP addresses is a well-known phenomenon among users. I have previously encountered such misunderstandings, yet my attempts to communicate this experience have not garnered belief.
- In light of the prevailing lack of trust in my account's dissociation from the articles I have created, coupled with my substantial contribution record exceeding 9,000 contributions on specific subjects, I find it prudent to refrain from further discourse. I appreciate the cooperation extended by everyone during my tenure on Wikipedia. It has been a gratifying experience, and I express my gratitude once again. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 03:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TheChenabTimes web Screenshot 4 Sept 2023.png
Thanks for uploading File:TheChenabTimes web Screenshot 4 Sept 2023.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
