User talk:The Last Honest Man

I've twice delete your article Donald Trump tax avoidance controversy. Do not recreate it. It is a POV fork that is already covered in the article Donald Trump, which is why it was speedy deleted under our criteria for material that is already covered in another article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Um. I don't think you've read either my article or Donald Trump. None of that material is in the main Trump article (how could it be? This information just came out today). By your logic, we'd have to delete Hillary Clinton e-mail controversy, too. You are not the emperor, and decisions are supposed to be made by consensus here. Or so i am told. your actions are out of line. There was nothing objectionable about my page, which concisyed almost entirely of direct quotations. Go pick up a newspaper and then come back to me. Better yet, just read my article and you'd be better informed. The Last Honest Man (talk) 11:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating this article. As far as I remember on the now-deleted talk page there was a comment that you created it more than once? could you please give me the link where it has been before? Has there been a regular deletion discussion? Thanks. 92.225.94.224 (talk) 13:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, The Last Honest Man, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Donald Trump tax avoidance controversy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 11:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which guidelines? Your message is profoundly unhelpful.The Last Honest Man (talk) 12:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Donald Trump tax avoidance controversy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Donald Trump tax avoidance controversy. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Donald Trump. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Donald Trump – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 12:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis, perhaps you have not seen this source: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html?action=click&contentCollection=us&module=NextInCollection&region=Footer&pgtype=article&version=newsevent&rref=collection%2Fnews-event%2Felection-2016 Or: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/2/report-trump-losses-may-mean-he-didnt-pay-taxes-fo/

I assure you there is nothing on this in the main article ( this is new) and even if there were, this warrants a page. I cannot understand how you could think otherwise. Try not to feel discouragedThe Last Honest Man (talk) 12:28, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Discloser of Truth, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

NasssaNser (^talk/_edits) 12:25, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for creating nonsense pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:47, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reblocked below. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Last Honest Man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand the reason for my block. Perhaps you disagreed with my page, or thought it needed editing, but it was certainly not "nonsense." Has anyone read the front page of today's NY Times yet? I provided a source: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html?action=click&contentCollection=us&module=NextInCollection&region=Footer&pgtype=article&version=newsevent&rref=collection%2Fnews-event%2Felection-2016. I ask to be unblocked because the charges against me are false, and I did not create nonsense but impeccably sourced claims.The Last Honest Man (talk)

Decline reason:

Sock of User:The Discloser of Truth, still creating attack pages. Huon (talk) 13:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your contributed article, Donald Trump tax avoidance controversy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Donald Trump tax avoidance controversy. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Donald Trump. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Donald Trump – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Marianna251TALK 12:47, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]