User talk:The Triple M
|This is The Triple M's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to The Triple M.|
- 1 Talkback
- 2 Blanking a talk page
- 3 Re:Adminship
- 4 A Barnstar For You!
- 5 Braveheart
- 6 VV Brown
- 7 RfA
- 8 Vandal IP
- 9 Whisperback
- 10 Whisperback
- 11 Whisperback
- 12 Talkback
- 13 A barnstar for you!
- 14 Do you respect a free and open internet?
- 15 Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- 16 The Gum
- 17 Tom Bombadil
- 18 WIBT
- 19 Phil Mason
- 20 Welcome to the Tyop Contest!
- 21 Tyop Contest Conclusion!
- 22 Welcoming new users
- 23 ArbCom elections are now open!
Blanking a talk page
If you haven't already read it, I'd read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship. That'll tell you a lot about what people here look for in potential admins. My biggest suggestion is to make more edits (my suggestion is several hundred more) in a wide variety of areas. Among other things, you could revert vandalism, participate in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion discussions, participate in Wikipedia:Articles for creation, put articles up for deletion, and help with building articles that need expansion. You shouldn't focus your edits in just one specific area. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:02, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
A Barnstar For You!
|The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar|
|18.104.22.168 (talk) 04:08, 23 June 2013 (UTC)|
Here is the webpage discussing his comments on Braveheart.
http://www.scotland.com/forums/scottish-politics/22112-billy-connolly-s-take-snp.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 02:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Not sure how this thing works but I'll write about whay I edited the Braveheart page.
That quote from Bill Connolly is totally wrong. He hated Braveheart, stating in an interview that it "Australian shite". Someone who like Mell Gibson or the movie doesn't want this out. The following is a direct quote from the man himself.
“Braveheart is pure Australian s***e…William Wallace was a spy, a thief, a blackmailer – a c**t basically. And people are swallowing it. It’s part of a new Scottish racism, which I loath – this thing that everything horrible is English. It’s conducted by the great unread and the conceited w***ers at the SNP, those dreary little pr**ks in Parliament who rely on bigotry for support” - Billy Connolly, Scottish Comedian
Hi I am the artist (VV Brown) and the page has several mistakes that I would like to change how do I go about doing this. Its very frustrating as I am an artist and would like the page to reflect myself correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 19:59, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi The Triple M. All users are welcome to participate in any discussions about the Wikipedia backroom and its management and it's nice to see new faces around. However, with only 174 edits to Wikipedia, perhaps you would like to read these pages to understand more about the RfA voting process.
As to the vandal IP ... the next time, to accelerate discipline, please take note ... if there has been a final warning given within the past month, you should report the vandal for blocking here, rather than (yet again) give a final warning. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:31, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Except, if it's an unregistered IP rather than a registered username, read "the past week" for "the past month".
- Well, I think so anyway.
- Reports can be made here. See also Wikipedia:Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism. Demi -- I don't recall seeing a shorter timeframe for IPs ... is that the case? We allow them to vandalize every 8 days? ;) --Epeefleche (talk) 02:18, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Epee, you are missing the point. Please brush up on things. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:20, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 02:59, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 03:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 04:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar|
|Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page before I even noticed it. :-) ToBeFree (talk) 21:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)|
I was happy to do it. Thank you! TheTriple M 21:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Do you respect a free and open internet?
Hi Three M. I'm calling you out. You presume to call yourself a steward of wikipedia and yet you jump to ban my IP after arguably minimal edits. Wikipedia is about open freedom for all who use it. I wasn't capriciously removing content. Rather I was removing what I found to be unsupported and frankly puerile content. I live in Richmond. It is not as dangerous as these spurious statements like "most dangerous city" in California claim. I simply removed unverified information (the references don't even mention Richmond). And even so,references don't imply truth, they are vehicles for presenting information and are not a priori true. I will say that I didn't realize there were places for an edit summary, and perhaps had I entered that, I wouldn't have been scorned. Also, I do appreciate that you are protecting the content. That's quite noble, but please don't lock the doors when you don't like the style of the edits. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 20:53, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, 184.108.40.206. I respect that you are not a wild vandal let loose on Wikipedia, but rather someone with sense. Allow me to quote something from your message. "You jump to ban my IP after arguably minimal edits." No, I gave you a final warning, and did not ban you. I'm not exactly jumping at the chance to do it, either. And "minimal edits?" You've deleted about 7,000 bytes of information. I'd hardly call it minimal. Also, I am not the only one involved in preventing you from deleting information. I am One of Many, Martinillo, AND Baseball Watcher have restrained you. I am not the only one to blame. Remember that. TheTriple M 21:08, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
|Say Hello to the World||An Invitation to Earth||Small Changes, Big Impact||The Neutral Point of View||The Veil of Verifiability||The Civility Code||Looking Good Together|
Hello! I'm replying in reference to the Tom Bombadil page you recently messaged me about. Here is a link to the source I found providing reliable information concerning the recent Tom Bombadil video. http://woub.org/2013/11/05/logan-girl-creates-video-adaptation-lord-rings
I found this link via TheOneRing.net (forum).
Of course I understand most YouTube videos shouldn't be included in a Wikipedia webpage, however, this video in particular was only uploaded to YouTube after it was offered a critiquing by Wingnut Productions.
I updated the WIBT listing to reflect correct information. Since I am the owner, I am the source!
220.127.116.11 (talk) 00:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC) Larry Fuss 01/01/14
I recently changed the information of Phil Mason, better know as Thunderf00t. I recently got a message from you saying you undid some of my edits because you felt they weren't constructive. I changed some of the content because I felt it was biased, misleading and didn't give enough background on the situations that were on his page. Just wanted to let you know, no disrespect but if you want to give a detailed yet fair account into what occurred with the online stalking incident he suffered and his views on feminism please do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcast99 (talk • contribs) 01:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to the Tyop Contest!
Tyop Contest Conclusion!
Welcoming new users
Hello The Triple M, I have removed placements of an image that you have been using to welcome new users; welcoming new users is a positive activity, however adding graphic images to their pages can be construed a bit bitey, especially when you claim to be trolling them. — xaosflux Talk 03:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)