User talk:TindDIrving

August 2023

Hello, I'm Onorem. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Onorem (talk) 12:48, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Scottish section of the North Sea Trail is being revived and added to materials for the North Highland Way to make the round the UK coastal route. TindDIrving (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. other web sites are allowed. Such as this one.

https://www.northhighland-way.com/ which is not the official route. The official route is the multi use one TindDIrving (talk) 19:05, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cordless Larry. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. This one https://www.northhighland-way.com/ is allowed, but it is not the one recommended by The Highland Council. I am always being asked about it and taking my time to answer, as there is no real information. TindDIrving (talk) 19:06, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You described that link in your edit as "the official route sanctioned by the Highland Council". There's no info about the route on the page you linked though, and nor does the page mention anything about it being official. It appears to be your website, which means you have a conflict of interest. If you want to request additions to these pages, please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Simple conflict of interest edit request. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:30, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://friendsofthenorthhighlandway.com/

https://highland.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=2fd3fc9c72d545f7bcf1b43bf5c8445f These are all of the Council maps

https://www.northhighland-way.com/ is also a web site belonging to interested parties, ie Easyways and this organisation work together. TindDIrving (talk) 02:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am TinaDIrving. I would not spell my own name wrong. TindDIrving (talk) 07:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:30, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is User:TindDIrving at North Highland Way. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not involved with this thread. I do know that there are attempts to undermine me and the North Highland Way project on which I am working with The Highland Council and Nature Scot. I am not TindDIrving and have not created such a thread. TindDIrving (talk) 07:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you're certainly logged in as TindDIrving, as your post here demonstrates. If that is not your account, please log out from it. The thread at the COI noticeboard was created by me - my message above was just a notification of that fact. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:16, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most odd. As you say, I will log out. Everything under the The North Highland Way is promotional material. Especially this one. https://www.northhighland-way.com/ This is not council approved. TindDIrving (talk) 07:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that Wikipedia articles are paraphrased summaries of material already published in reliable and independent sources. Anyone can edit any article at any time; the subject of the article does not have any right of ownership or overriding authority to approve or decline what other editors contribute. The aim is to build an article through consensus, so content disputes should be discussed on the article's talk page (Talk:North Highland Way) and resolved through a process of civil discussion and compromise. If that fails to resolve the disagreement, other dispute resolution measures are available. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not interested, as you only take their side. I don't see them responding. I have no time for this, I am working. You either want content on Wikipedia or you dont. I am a journalist, I am a reliable and independent source. These are just people trying to take over The Highland Council's project. 2.25.110.189 (talk) 15:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please log in. ''Flux55'' (talk) 20:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on North Highland Way

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page North Highland Way, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is User:TindDIrving at North Highland Way (again). Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello TindDIrving! Your additions to North Highland Way have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 18:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The copy right is mine.. Source materials have been sent. TindDIrving (talk) 18:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Green tourism

What is green tourism. The North Highland Way is green tourism and has a beneficial effect on climate change. TindDIrving (talk) 18:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TindDIrving. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ''Flux55'' (talk) 20:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at North Highland Way, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As stated. I will not be changing anything. Or using Wikipedia. If I am not considered to be a reliable source, when I designed and launched the project, I am not interested. TindDIrving (talk) 06:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia only makes use of published sources, not individual knowledge, I'm afraid. See Wikipedia:Verifiability. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a published source. As a journalist, I am a published source. Individual knowledge is journalism, what else is it? it is like people who do not understand that groups have to be administered by somebody, as on Facebook. The person administering a Facebook page would not refer to committee members every time they wanted to post something. Anyway, as I said, I won't be wasting my time adding contributions to Wikipedia as they consider me an unreliable source. However other people are allowed to submit to this project, and theirs is individual knowledge. Never mind. Not interested. TindDIrving (talk) 07:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only published knowledge, then, is from the Scottish Herald many years ago and the links to the other pages. TindDIrving (talk) 07:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might be the author of published sources, but you aren't one yourself. When adding claims such as "Caithness Waybaggers never applied for funding", you'd need to add a reference to a published source that supports that. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Caithness Waybaggers would tell you that themselves. There was no Scottish Outdoor Access Code in those days, I helped write it, and the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 as well, but as that is not published, I cannot prove it. Nature Scot do not publish things like that. As stated. I have no further interest in the erroneous information on this Wikipedia page. It is very clear that someone, and I have told you who, is sabotagaing the project, and I am afraid Wikipedia are helping them. Thanks. TindDIrving (talk) 07:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That they "would tell you that themselves" isn't enough - as I explained, published sources are required. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logging off now. and I won't be back. TindDIrving (talk) 07:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No where is it advertised that there is a track over A'Mhoine yet that is included. Only I and the Highland Access Officer know that is what is planned. and maybe the owner of the northhighlandway.com web site, which is allowed to be advertised but not www.friendsofthenorthhighlandway.com.

As I said, not interested. TindDIrving (talk) 07:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All of the northhighlandway.com web site is individual knowledge of course. My knowledge, which he stole. TindDIrving (talk) 07:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. As I said, I will not be using Wikipedia again. It is biased against true contributors, ie me, but not against other editors who are not chastised for their behaviour. Not interested in submitting anything at all. I did this, as with the development of said project, on a voluntary basis, yet get my time taken up with nonsense. 2A00:23C7:7829:9B01:9193:26D2:96CE:2971 (talk) 09:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to post, log in. No one has been anything other than civil with you; you just don't like the advice you are being given. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]