User talk:Tlrtls1478

July 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to EgyptAir, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! SideshowBob7 (talk) 10:03, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jetstreamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Aurora (airline), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:25, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Korean Air, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SideshowBob7 (talk) 14:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Korean Air. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SideshowBob7 (talk) 08:54, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Korean Air. SideshowBob7 (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Korean Air while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. SideshowBob7 (talk) 09:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HkCaGu (talk) 07:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. YOU MUST STOP MESSING WITH THOSE AIRPORT NAMES IN DESTINATION LISTS NOW! THOSE ARE NOT THE NAMES OF THOSE AIRPORTS! YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED MANY TIMES! HkCaGu (talk) 15:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for continuing to add incorrect airport names to destination articles despite request to stop and discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MilborneOne (talk) 16:49, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tlrtls1478 please discuss any changes you want to make to airport names in destination articles on the relevant article talk pages rather than keep changing them, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 16:49, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tlrtls1478. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tlrtls1478 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm an aviation expert in Korea and I have a right to edit in Wikipedia. However, Ed (Edgar181 and PhilKnight violates my human rights to edit. This violates United Nations International Human Rights Law. So I request to release my block in order to keep my human rights. If they decilne it, I'll do PC

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request to unblocking without legal reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tlrtls1478 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wiki editor named Edgar181 is blocked my account without no any legal reason and he is interrupting my Wiki life. Please release this blocking.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

User has engaged in block evasion, as KE Aviatior (talk · contribs), in June, 2018. --Yamla (talk) 13:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]