User talk:Tom Sponheim

Hello, Tom Sponheim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Simplified Ruleset
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Wikipedia Glossary
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango 123 17:04, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Ravenna Park

Hi there, The content you uploaded for Ravenna Park (Seattle) was copyrighted text from a couple of City of Seattle Web sites, so I removed it and replaced it with some stub text. -Lukobe 05:03, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Third Place Books

Tom, it was a pleasure to meet you today. I'm looking forward to reading your contributions. To leave me a message, click on talk in my signature and edit my talk page, or simply reply here so the discussion is not disjoint. I'll be watching this page (by selecting the watch tab at the top). Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:04, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ravenna Park & geolinks templates

Please take a look at the links I added to Ravenna Park. At the bottom of my talk page is an example of how it's done. I was impressed to find such a powerful tool already present (but not well-advertised). -Walter Siegmund (talk) 23:22, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ravenna Park

I added a new picture yesterday. Your comments are welcome. -Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:47, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Solar-Panel-Cooker-in-front-of-hut.jpg

Image:Solar-Panel-Cooker-in-front-of-hut.jpg has a deletion tag. Follow the link in the tag to get more information. -Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:31, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Otter Rock, Oregon

A tag has been placed on Otter Rock, Oregon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Diez2 19:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the speedy tag to prod while I collect more information. If you can help by improving the article with encyclopedic content, please do so.--Grand Slam 7 19:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a bit and Katr67 turned it into a reasonable article. Walter Siegmund (talk) 23:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Root wall

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Root wall, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.greenbeltconsulting.com/ctp/therootwall.html. As a copyright violation, Root wall appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Root wall has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Root wall and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Root wall with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Root wall.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. JNW (talk) 02:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Root wall

We appreciate your interest in the Root wall article but, for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites ( http://www.greenbeltconsulting.com/ctp/therootwall.html ) and as a consequence, the article has been deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." Please be aware that it is not sufficient for the material to be "available for use by non-profit organizations and public education" because Wikipedia is also redistributed for profit.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. Regards, FreplySpang 02:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:HotPot-cooking-vessel.jpg

File:HotPot-cooking-vessel.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:HotPot-cooking-vessel.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:HotPot-cooking-vessel.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Minimum-Solar-Box-Cooker.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Minimum-Solar-Box-Cooker.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Root wall.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Root wall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Ralph W. Moss (writer), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Equinox Publishing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Solar Cookers World Network

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Solar Cookers World Network, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.pciaonline.org/node/225.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:50, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Solar Cookers World Network

The article Solar Cookers World Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no indication that this article meets the criteria for inclusion. As for now, it is not referenced by any independent sources, and it doesn't seem there is any significant coverage by independent sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tom, I see that you denied proposed deletion on the article you created. I still don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. I can't seem to find anything that amounts to significant coverage in independent sources that have editorial control. Therefor I have opened a wider discussion on the subject. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Keep in mind however that, opposed to proposed deletion, where any editor can remove the tag to deny the deletion, this does not go for the community discussion. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 02:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Nomination of Solar_Cookers_International for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article article name is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar_Cookers_International until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Cantaloupe2 (talk) 08:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SCInet problems

Hi Tom:

For a while now, there have been problems with SCInet. For exampe, the editor won't load. Graphics are missing, e.g. from the Parabolic Solar Reflectors page. The list of recent changes does not appear, etc. I have tried to notify you there about this, but since I can't load the editor, I haven't neen able to do so.

Can you do anything to fix it?

DOwenWilliams (talk) 21:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Minimum-Solar-Box-Cooker.jpeg

The file File:Minimum-Solar-Box-Cooker.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Root wall

The article Root wall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. It's a product offered by a few engineering companies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Water Pasteurisation Indicator" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Water Pasteurisation Indicator. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 18#Water Pasteurisation Indicator until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]