User talk:Torah musa

thetorah.com

You are wasting your time adding material from thetorah.com as it is impossible that it will ever be considered a reliable source. Moreover, if you see an academic article mentioned at thetorah.com you can't just copy from there, you have to read the academic article yourself and summarise it yourself. Zero^talk 04:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are also adding material not in the cited sources

This has to stop if you don't want to be blocked. Doug Weller talk 15:12, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Battle of Siddim

added a link pointing to Hazor

Chedorlaomer

added a link pointing to Hazor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Siddim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hazor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Lone-078. I noticed that you recently removed content from Avaris without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lone-078 (talk) 12:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thank you for your kind message.

I read the Bietak more carefully, and found out that his claim was not to mean that the most of the city was abandoned and majority left the city. Instead, majority stayed in the city and the major parts of the city were still in use. Also, the sources that I cited previously for the sentences that I wrote try to convey the claim that majority of the semitic population stayed and prospered under the New Kingdom's Egyptian rule. Considering them, I reverted my changes to the original one, and quite sadly, my changes were reverted once again. Torah musa (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Torah musa! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:09, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jacob, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Israel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Torah musa! Your additions to Jacob have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also

When you edit WP-articles, please use Help:Edit summary to help other editors to understand what you are doing. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will do that. Torah musa (talk) 20:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Ermenrich (talk) 20:45, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Book of Exodus has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Also numerous other articles. — Diannaa (talk) 02:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop mismarking edits as being minor when they are not. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. If you continue to do this, you may be blocked. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shasu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Megiddo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Your edit to Sanchuniathon has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 15:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]