User talk:Trlissauer

Possibly unfree File:MP 1559(web).jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MP 1559(web).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Trevor Lissauer, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. --Ebyabe (talk) 00:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Carolyn Stotesbery. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please also note that text from the subject's website cannot be copied onto Wikipedia: see WP:COPYVIO AllyD (talk) 20:05, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

It doesn't matter if you know Carolyn Stotesbery, and it doesn't matter if you own the content you submitted. The point is, any random editor can claim anything they want, which means nothing. Wikipedia itself needs verifiable permission from the copyright holder to reproduce any content already published elsewhere. See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries to go about doing this. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:51, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carolyn stotesbery

Hello Trlissauer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Carolyn stotesbery for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Trevor Lissauer. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:13, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for your protection

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, Trlissauer, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You are welcome to continue to edit under this username, but we ask the following:

Please be willing and able to prove your identity to Wikipedia.
Please send an e-mail to info-enwikimedia.org. Be aware that the volunteer response team that handles e-mail is indeed operated entirely by volunteers, and the reply may not be immediate.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:16, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]