User talk:UTTAM BORN TO RUN

Welcome![edit]

Hello, UTTAM BORN TO RUN, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Joshua Issac (talk) 21:30, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

uttam[edit]

	uttam
	my photo UTTAM 400 1500 (talk) 18:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UTTAM BORN TO RUN, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi UTTAM BORN TO RUN! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Protection[edit]

Please do not add templates like {{edit protected}} or {{permanently protected}} to this page in an attempt to prevent others from editing - it will not work. If you wish the page User:UTTAM BORN TO RUN to be protected, an administrator needs to alter the appropriate page setting; you can ask for this to be done by filing a request at WP:RFPP. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page is not protected. No edit request made. You were advised how to request that your page be protected by Redrose64. Templates removed, please do not restore. Also, between you and me - I am very close to requesting that your page be deleted. Wikipedia is not a web host. Regards, Syrthiss (talk) 17:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:UTTAM BORN TO RUN[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:UTTAM BORN TO RUN, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Syrthiss (talk) 14:07, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Peridon (talk) 17:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would repeat the comment above about Wikipedia not being a free web host. Also, I am trying to remember in which user's contributions I have seen material very similar to this before - are you using more than one account? There are cases where use of more than one account is permitted. Using more than one account to post self-glorification is not one of those. Peridon (talk) 17:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Peridon (talk) 17:17, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account is blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Indianathlete2016. Peridon (talk) 17:19, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UTTAM BORN TO RUN (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I AM SORRY FOR THAT ONE AND ONCE AGAIN I WILL NOT REPEAT IT AGAIN,SO PLEASE ALLOW ME AND UNBLOCK HENCE, ALSO I AM NEW TO THE WIKIPEDIA UTTAM BORN TO RUN (talk) 09:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not new to wikipedia; you have used at least six accounts here in the last sixteen months. Given that you will not, under any circumstance, be allowed to write about yourself, what else do you want to write about?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:04, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your first account was started in January 2012, and you had started at least two more accounts before that one was blocked. In all, I can see six accounts that you have used, all to promote yourself. I see no sign of wishing to help build the encyclopaedia. What editing would you be doing if you were unblocked? Peridon (talk) 10:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have just looked at your user page, and I see that your English is very bad. If you succeed in being unblocked, I suggest that any future edits you wish to make are written with the help of a native English speaker, as you may otherwise risk a block for competence issues.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]