User talk:Unitedreland

Unitedreland, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Unitedreland!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Institute for Molecular Engineering (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wxidea was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Institute for Molecular Engineering and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wxidea (talk) 04:18, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Unitedreland, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wxidea (talk) 04:18, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Institute for Molecular Engineering (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wxidea was:

Please do full reference citations (more like a normal bibliography, with the original date, author, publication name).

In my opinion, the IBTimes article does not establish notability since it was about the launch. I'd be interested in coverage of the IME after launch. Some impact or interest. If your institute itself doesn't get coverage, then wait until a few of your projects do, and add a section here of notable projects that HAVE media coverage, or other tertiary sources.

Every university department and institute can't be in Wikipedia unless they cross some kind of threshold for notability. I'm afraid details like NSF awards don't count.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Institute for Molecular Engineering and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wxidea (talk) 20:18, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

University of Chicago edits

Please look at WP:PRESTIGE. Words like "most prestigious" and "preeminent institutions" are not allowed. You need to "Avoid vague terms of praise and ambiguous superlatives." I've reverted your edit and suggest that you not re-add any ambiguous superlatives. If you want to keep your addition, look over WP:PRESTIGE and re-word it. Also, Lydhia is not targeting the page; they know why it needs removed. Please fix this problem instead of edit-warring. Thanks. Corkythehornetfan 17:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at University of Chicago. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Contributor321 (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Institute for Molecular Engineering concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Institute for Molecular Engineering, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Institute for Molecular Engineering

Hello, Unitedreland. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Institute for Molecular Engineering".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paulson Institute Logo 2015.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paulson Institute Logo 2015.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]