User talk:Unofficialeditor

Hello, and welcome to Unofficialeditors's Talk Page. If you have a talk page relating to mine please edit this and add on the bottom your username so that I can (if possible) change my talk page name.

Unofficialeditor (talk) 18:49, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome (belated)

Hello, Unofficialeditor, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to become a productive contributor. Your contributions can be easily found and monitored. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

No Post Here

October 2011

Looking at Charge of the Light Brigade by Alfred, Lord Tennyson Unofficialeditor (talk) 17:46, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Is time going faster?

Unofficialeditor (talk) 17:46, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello again

Unofficialeditor (talk) 26 September 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Hello, I'm Dawnseeker2000. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Piracy because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 14:30, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to 2012 phenomenon, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. MadGuy7023 (talk) 15:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

also your edit to 21 December 2012 was non constructive. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TOSHIBA NB520

The article TOSHIBA NB520 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Written like an essay/review. Unless significantly wikified, this has no place on Wikipedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Osarius - Want a chat? 21:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with TOSHIBA NB520

Hello. Concerning your contribution, TOSHIBA NB520, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/netbooks/toshiba-nb520-review-50003260/. As a copyright violation, TOSHIBA NB520 appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. TOSHIBA NB520 has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:TOSHIBA NB520 and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:TOSHIBA NB520 with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:TOSHIBA NB520.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cornell University. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Dravecky (talk) 22:47, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WOPP, you may be blocked from editing. Dravecky (talk) 22:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Grey hat has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Grey hat was changed by Unofficialeditor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893528 on 2014-07-16T06:00:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies!

Apologies to the Bots/Mods/Admins/Editors here of Wikipedia.

I genuinely thought I was making a difference, but clearly not - I formally apologise, and hereby commit my pen to the world of good. Some have thought my contributions were apparently not constructive, in my personal opinion, it hurts.

Apologies, goodbye, you may never see me again.

Unofficialeditor (talk) 22:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alan Rickman, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 21:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 01:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]