User talk:VictoriaNYC
VictoriaNYC, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi VictoriaNYC! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 21:37, 5 July 2015 (UTC) |
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Society for New Music, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.societyfornewmusic.org/about.cfm.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:14, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Society for New Music
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Society for New Music, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.societyfornewmusic.org/about.cfm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Society for New Music and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Society for New Music, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Society for New Music. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Society for New Music with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Society for New Music saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:22, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I added citations and references from secondary and/or tertiary sources. Removing the notes about sources for now, since this should be enough references to prove validity of sections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictoriaNYC (talk • contribs) 11:42, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Society for New Music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Rouse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Hello, VictoriaNYC, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some links to pages that you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! – Wdchk (talk) 11:16, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks everyone, and thanks for the warm welcome. Having a good time adding or editing entries. Will be more social as time goes on! VictoriaNYC (talk) 14:35, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest stuff.
[edit]Hi. You should probably stop and read WP:COI. --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 19:28, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- I did. I have no conflict of interest with the subject and/or topics of my articles, I am a musicologist.VictoriaNYC (talk) 03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- If you are not in fact the Victoria closely related to the person you seem to be promoting, please pardon my presumptions. But still read WP:PROMO, maybe. --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 04:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- VictoriaNYC, I hope you will take comments left here as friendly advice and not any kind of "accusation". Nearly everybody here is working towards the same goal of improving the encyclopedia. Based on what I have seen, you seem to be making the effort to follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, in particular with respect to providing reliable sources. If you continue to follow any relevant policies and guidelines, all will be well in the Wiki world! – Wdchk (talk) 12:08, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- Indeed, thank you Wdchk. This is why I avoid the use of boilerplate templates. I just feel like the creeping use of Wikipedia for self promotion is one of the biggest dangers that it faces, and it can happen even in good faith, hence an early heads-up about anything resembling it seems in order. --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 20:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- VictoriaNYC, I hope you will take comments left here as friendly advice and not any kind of "accusation". Nearly everybody here is working towards the same goal of improving the encyclopedia. Based on what I have seen, you seem to be making the effort to follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, in particular with respect to providing reliable sources. If you continue to follow any relevant policies and guidelines, all will be well in the Wiki world! – Wdchk (talk) 12:08, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- If you are not in fact the Victoria closely related to the person you seem to be promoting, please pardon my presumptions. But still read WP:PROMO, maybe. --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 04:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to both of you, and no worries - I was actually concerned that someone would assume I was the wife of one of the subjects I was writing about (Victoria Paterson), since we have the same name, but fortunately, that's not the case, and is just a coincidence. I wasn't sure how to indicate that, but perhaps this thread will serve as a record of this conversation.VictoriaNYC (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 7 August
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Robert Paterson (composer) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, VictoriaNYC. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Cote (writer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Maxwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, VictoriaNYC. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)