User talk:Vinodmane1
User:PhilKnight I appreciate your response. I will like to edit about History, Defense,Beauty and Cosmetics.
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Vinodmane1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! signed, Rosguill talk 16:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Indrajaal Drone Defence India Pvt Ltd
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Indrajaal Drone Defence India Pvt Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. •Cyberwolf• 14:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- As of 9 10 am nov 6 2023. Page has been deleted •Cyberwolf• 14:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of DNIF Hypercloud
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on DNIF Hypercloud, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 02:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:10, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Vinodmane1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi Seraphimblade, Hope you are doing well. I am writing regarding deletion of DNIF Hybercloud page.I am on this platform since last 6 months and trying my best to do good things and become a trusted part of Wikipedia community. I like to share knowledge and that is the main reason to join this platform. I am learning about policies and guidelines best to my understanding and so while drafting the page,I by mistake moved it to Mainspace.This is a learning to me and I will be more conscious in my future projects. Also, I would appreciate your guidance and would be Thankful if you would unblock me.Vinodmane1 (talk) 15:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vinodmane1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, I am writing this for my request to unblock me as I assure you that I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia's content and preventing promotional material, I believe there may have been a mistake in my understanding of wikipedia policies as I am new to platform and was exploring in this case. I want to assure you that I was causing no harm to Wikipedia and my intentions were to share knowledge only, but I messed up with my editing. I acknowledge the mistake and I am committed to strictly follow to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines moving forward. I assure you that I understand the importance of neutrality and verifiability in Wikipedia articles and I am willing to contribute constructively to the community. I kindly request you to consider lifting the block, allowing me to rectify any past errors and contribute positively to Wikipedia. Thank you.Vinodmane1 (talk) 01:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please put aside ChatGPT for a moment and respord and address the advertising issues that are the reason for your block.OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- That's very CHATbotesque. Please rewrite in your own words to describe how you "messed up," what you would do different, and what constructive edits you'd make. Thanks.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- I messed up with my editing is because I was not able to properly put my knowledge about the subject into words under guidelines and policies of wikipedia, and my content looked promotional although I had no intentions to do so.
I assure you to strictly follow wikipedia guidelines and policies henceforth and be very cautious while editing or publishing.
I joined wikipedia as I love to share knowledge and for me constructive edits will be that I would help stub articles to expand where I have knowledge about the subject, add pictures from my collection on relevant topics and write about subjects that I feel interesting and worthy to share on wikipedia but all under the guidelines of wikipedia.
Thank you.
Vinodmane1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, @Seraphimblade: I am writing this for a request to unblock me as I understand the reason behind block. I am new to the platform and learning from experience. In this case, I would say I was not able to follow policies properly and my editing / use of words made my article to look like an advertisement or promotional but I want to assure you that I had no such intentions. Also, there is or will be no harm from my end to wikipedia's policies, and I will strictly follow policies in future. Thank you.Vinodmane1 (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vinodmane1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, I am writing this for a request to unblock me as I understand the reason behind my block.I also understand the concern and importance of the reason I am blocked for. But as I am new to the platform and learning from experience. In this case, I would say I was not able to follow policies properly and my editing / use of words made my article to look like an advertisement or promotional and I accidentally published it! but I want to assure you that I had no intention of doing advertisment or promotion of anything or anybody. I had joined wikipedia only because I like to share knowledge. Also, there is or will be no harm from my end to wikipedia's policies.Furthermore, I accept my mistake but also assure nothing was intentional, also would appreciate if guidance is provided so that I can be a small part of wikipedia community. Thank you.Vinodmane1 (talk) 17:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not a bad unblock request, but you don't say what topics you want to edit. PhilKnight (talk) 16:27, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vinodmane1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, I am writing this for a request to unblock me as I understand the reason behind my block.I also understand the concern and importance of the reason I am blocked for. But as I am new to the platform and learning from experience. In this case, I would say I was not able to follow policies properly and my editing / use of words made my article to look like an advertisement or promotional and I accidentally published it! but I want to assure you that I had no intention of doing advertisment or promotion of anything or anybody. I had joined wikipedia only because I like to share knowledge. Also, there is or will be no harm from my end to wikipedia's policies.Furthermore, I accept my mistake but also assure nothing was intentional, also would appreciate if guidance is provided so that I can be a small part of wikipedia community and continue editing on topics like history, defence and beauty Thank you.Vinodmane1 (talk) 15:46, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline as this is a duplicate of the request below. Ponyobons mots 21:31, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vinodmane1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, I am writing this for a request to unblock me as I understand the reason behind my block.I also understand the concern and importance of the reason I am blocked for. But as I am new to the platform and learning from experience. In this case, I would say I was not able to follow policies properly and my editing / use of words made my article to look like an advertisement or promotional and I accidentally published it! but I want to assure you that I had no intention of doing advertisment or promotion of anything or anybody. I had joined wikipedia only because I like to share knowledge. Also, there is or will be no harm from my end to wikipedia's policies.Furthermore, I accept my mistake but also assure nothing was intentional, also would appreciate if guidance is provided so that I can be a small part of wikipedia community and continue editing on topics like history, defence and beauty Thank you.Vinodmane1 (talk) 15:46, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The issues with promotional editing extend well beyond the two articles you created that were deleted. Many of your edits added blatantly promotional content to articles (such as here here here and here), which look to have been copied from somewhere and other edits such as this and this, that demonstrate a lack of understanding of English grammar. Ponyobons mots 21:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.