User talk:Vipinsodhi87

Vipinsodhi87, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Vipinsodhi87! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:18, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Chandra Bhan Prasad, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 07:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Vipinsodhi87. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Chandra Bhan Prasad, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 08:51, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chandra Bhan Prasad. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. - NQ (talk) 06:56, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 08:33, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Chandra Bhan Prasad. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC) == Only Warning: COI at Chandra Bhan Prasad You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chandra Bhan Prasad. Please read Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy, in particular the section titled Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Dealing_with_single-purpose_accounts. regentspark (comment) 12:43, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear. You may be blocked, without further warning, for any edits you make to the Chandra Bhan Prasad article. I suggest you stick to making suggestions on the talk page instead of directly editing the article. --regentspark (comment) 19:16, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]