User talk:Wavy G

This user may have left Wikipedia. Wavy G has not edited Wikipedia since July 16, 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

alt.tv.real-world

I didn't delete it, I listed it for AfD. Talk to User:Lucky 6.9, he's the one who deleted it. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:52, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did. We get bombarded by articles of this type. Simply put, this is not a depository for information on every Usenet group on the internet. It is of little or no interest to anyone outside your group and is a poor use of this site's resources. Am I discriminating? I most certainly am. So are the folks who run this site. Allowing articles like this would set a horrendous precident. If you please, kindly read WP:NOT to learn more about how to contribute. This is a general, worldwide reference work. Your contributions should be of interest to a worldwide audience. I am glad to help you if you wish, but not if you flame my talk page. - Lucky 6.9 05:41, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Don't know if this is getting to you, as I am still new to this)

No intentions on flaming you, I just felt it was unfair to delete my article. I understand you get bombarded with silly articles about web forums and discussion boards, which are like vanity articles on someone's little "hole in the corner of the web." However, I really felt alt.tv.real-world is more noteworthy (along the lines of the infamy of the alt.fan.karl-malden.nose group, [which has a Wikipedia entry, mind you] as we associate, but are not affiliated with them) due to its history and widespread fanbase. Wikipedia has several articles on Usenet, flamewars, and trolls, etc, and I thought a few articles (like mine) that actually provide examples would help fill in those topics a little better. Wavy G 06:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi...I just got word on my talk page. Thanks for being polite. I truly appreciate that. I've had some second thoughts about deleting your article. In the interest of fairness, I'll gladly restore the article and the discussion as to whether or not it should stay. - Lucky 6.9 06:26, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's back on. My suggestion: Leave the deletion notice on, but provide proof of your claims by adding more to the article. Hit rankings, size of membership, that sort of thing. There's no establishment whatsoever regarding notability in the article's current state. If it's as large as you say, it should be worth an article. Sorry for the inconvenience. - Lucky 6.9 06:32, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Griffith Show pictures

Thanks for noticing and for starting all those character pages. Give me time and I will do what I can. Make yourself familiar with Wiki "Fair Use" rules and you can probably find some on your own. Ee60640 08:53, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Crump and The Darlings now have pictures. Ee60640 10:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those pics look good. I think they meet the standards of Wiki for what they are in terms of proper use. How about we both keep looking around for similar ones with better resolution. Thanks. Ee60640 08:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

The Mediation Cabal

You are a disputant in a case listed under Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases. We invite you to be a mediator in a different case. Please read How do I get a mediator assigned to my case? for more information.
SteveBot (talk) 07:28, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--Fasten 12:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LUE and Internet phenomenon

It's a subforum of GameFAQs; so, it's covered by GameFAQs. Danny Lilithborne 04:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think it's necessary to readd it since, as I said, it's covered by GameFAQs. So you did the right thing by deleting it. Just letting you know what it is. ;) Danny Lilithborne 04:58, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A-Team

I didn't realise "tyres" had an alternative spelling, so I'm sorry for changing it! I think there is quite a strong fanbase of "cult TV" over in GB. Mr T is very popular on t-shirts. Laters! Slumgum | yap | stalk | 22:47, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your amusing reply. Yes, everyone (well, nearly) says "cheers", although I prefer the phrase "cheers ears!". Toodle pip old bean, etc.
Slumgum | yap | stalk | 00:05, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they did actually go to a Beverly Hills medium on the show to contact George Peppard. They gave her a Hannibal action figure to use to contact his spirit. The show was light-hearted and really good fun.
Slumgum | yap | stalk | 00:36, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just found this on youtube. The last 10 mins of the aforementioned show. Check it out. sʟυмɢυм • т • c 19:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Fool

My apologies. I meant well. Honest! Thefool 07:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		Thanks for helping with the team effort to improve List of Andy Griffith Show episodes. Fife Club 02:51, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For tirelessly ripping out vanity entries and non-phenomena from Internet phenomenon, from one you didn't rip out. Jay Maynard 00:34, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Rory096 01:34, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beastie

Hello .. Yes I regret that whole beast thing. so clearly a troll in retrospect .. BabuBhatt 02:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for cleaning up my edits to the Infamous Moments article. I make lots of typos :-( Psycho Master (Karwynn) 14:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gillette Mach3

Hi, Wavy G! I know that it is not so evident, but Gillette Mach3 has got a reference to Saturday Night Live in the section "Parodies". This is why I included it into the "see also" of Saturday Night Live. --Daĉjo^почта 16:17, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Actually I'm Italian and I've never seen SNL, so maybe that link should be omitted. Anyway, what does "good morrow" mean? --Daĉjo^почта 06:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Who came up with that? (Brady Bunch)

I mistakenly thought it was Davis for some reason. Thanks for correcting it! WhisperToMe 03:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I created the article. And it had "Allan Davis" in when it was first created. WhisperToMe 03:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know a whole lot about the Bradies either, but I can look for a character site with detailed information. I created the page so that "Jan Brady" will have somewhere decent to redirect to. WhisperToMe 03:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mikey Teutil

I was just at the OCC webpage.

It's a blatant copyvio. The content came directly from the OCC page. Please don't remove copyvio tags. CQJ 06:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check the talk page. Specifically, it's the latter part of the article, taken directly from this page. CQJ 06:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Memes

While "I'M IN UR" can probably go into the Image Macro section I didn't spot before, unilaterally removing the Jack Bauer meme on the grounds that it's "certainly not as big as Chuck Norris and others" is a little foolhardy. The "size" of the Chuck Norris variant is perhaps indisputable - as it has been featured on television, being read by Norris himself - and is probably the original, but the Bauer variety is at the very least directly comparable to the Mr. T and Vin Diesel ones, which manage un-reverted citations. In fact, if I were to unilaterally delete one of the four it would be the Vin Diesel one as I can't remember a single "Vin Diesel fact" off the top of my head, but can recall at least a few Chuck Norris, Mr. T and Jack Bauer "facts" without any trouble at all - meaning that Vin Diesel is "certainly not as big as Chuck Norris and others".

Though I wouldn't take it upon myself to just up and delete one because I hadn't heard of it - especially as Wikipedia tends to be a source of learning, even if it is just learning about facile internet memes...

Famine 16:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: No problems

Famine 17:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Double-edit: I've just noticed that "Jack Bauer facts" (along with Mr. T and Vin Diesel "facts") are actually directly referred to on the Chuck Norris Facts page of Wikipedia!

Famine 17:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Meme

Where was the EBaum controversy and troll attacks on eBaum's forums? The velociraptor 02:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean where is it listed on the article? I don't know anything about this. Wavy G 02:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I resad your comments on the Internet Meme history page, you said they were either already on the page or not that meme-ish. The velociraptor 02:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi - thanks for fixing my errant signature. Not quite sure how that happened. Keep up the good work. --Hamiltonian 04:40, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Internet phenonmenon edits - It's difficult to come to a definition of an "internet phenomenon" (as you know). I see an internet phenomenon as some that spreads through the internet quickly, gaining widespread attention. Margolis doesn't really fit into this criteria because while she did become famous through the internet, her image only really stayed "in one place", she did a lot of work off of the internet, her big claim to fame was overtaken years ago by someone else. If the definition of an internet phenomenon allows something like Margolis (who I agree is popular, should be on wikipedia, etc.) and, say, the Star Wars Kid (who I personally think fits the idea of an internet phenomenon more closely) to be on the same page, the definition of an internet phenomenon is virtually useless.

I see. An Internet phenomenon is something that is "spread" across the Internet. I was thinking "became famous on the Internet" (which, I could only assume, is what everyone who throws something onto the list must be thinking). Okay, it makes sense now. I just wanted to be on the same page, here.

Perhaps a solution could be to split the page into various subpages, with slightly varying definitions.

Say (the titles aren't perfect):

List of internet memes - a previous title of the article, would include really popular stuff that pops up on YouTube, etc. (OK Go dance, Star Wars Kid) Stuff that might appear on WebJunk 20, etc. (i.e. viral videos). This page would likely need to be split into several - for say, video/animation/audio, and "other" (text, etc., like Chuck Norris)
List of internet celebrities - would include Margolis and people who became famous because of the internet (a broader definition of people than might be included on the page right now). Henry Earl, Star Wars kid could be here too, etc.

The big problem is definition. I've been trying to get people to come to some consensus for over a year (it feels that long anyhow), but hardly anyone seems to be interested. Cheers. --Hamiltonian 05:08, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it must be that everyone has their own idea of what fits the definition, and no one wants to worry about the details. Maybe if the opening paragraph clarified the definition (but like you said, it need to come to a consensus), it might deter some of the people from adding non-notable entries, or non-phemonena. Wavy G 05:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Laugh

Comparing Dish Network Channel Grid to the presidents at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dish Network Channel Grid. I needed a good laugh tonight. (And you even made a valid point!)EnsRedShirt 03:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Uncle Buck article

To tell the truth, in this article, Uncle Buck was the only film where Jean Louisa Kelly was a child actress. In this article, you will need to add the headline about the common mistakes and say that some contents in the film were cut when the film was on television. --PJ Pete

All users will need to discuss changes in the article of the film, Uncle Buck. --PJ Pete

ZOOM

Thanks for deleting the strong accent comment on the ZOOM article. I had never noticed it, and would have deleted it if I had. The comment had been there since SEPTEMBER 7!!!! SupaStarGirl 14:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

regarding Rene Clausen

I have recently read your comments in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rene Clausen area. Your statements saying that I did not verify Dr. Clausen's notability is false. I specifically left refernces that displayed his importance, contributions, and life in the world of modern choral arts. Did you look at them? Let me assure that he is most worthy to have his own article on wikipedia. If you disagree with my actions, then please tell me what I am doing wrong. I strongly wish for my article to remain on this site, and not be deleted! (my apologies for the "special notes")

Thank You, User:wittj

The A-Team characters

Good Job creating separate articles for Hannibal, Murdock and Faceman. And just let you know I took the liberty of creating Category:The A-Team characters, so all four articles in cluding BA's can be found there. I also created Category:The A-Team, for all the articles and categories related to The A-Team. Quasyboy 2:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of High Culture
		For four long-overdue articles. —`freak(talk)` 07:39, Oct. 30, 2006 (UTC)

RE: "Web sites"/"websites"

"Hi, I'm not going to argue with you because it is a pointless topic, but I just thought I would point you to the American Heritage Dictionary Fourth Ed [1]. As you can see, "Web site" is merely an accepted variant of the correct word, "website." No where does it state that this is the proper spelling of the term. The usage note points out the transition from the original "Web site" to "Website" and finally to "website," the accepted spelling of the word. I WIN!!!1!1!! Love, Wavy G 22:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)"

" 'World Wide Web' is a name that needs to be capitalized, like 'Internet.' It is made up of Web pages and Web sites (or, less formally, Websites)."

As the article states:

". . . the Associated Press Stylebook, Reuters, Microsoft, academia, and dictionaries such as Oxford and Merriam-Webster use the two-word, capitalised spelling 'Web site'. This is because 'Web' is not a general term but a shortened form of 'World Wide Web'."

In the discussion of the article:

"The use of 'website' by 'newspapers and other media' is utterly incorrect. Most newspapers and other media use 'Web site'. AP Style, as well as several other authorities, forbid "website". The only mainstream media that uses "website" that comes to mind immediately is WIRED Magazine, which made the controversial change relatively recently."

Also,

"The internationally recognized official Web standards are established and published by the World Wide Web Consortium or W3C and can be found at the site [www.w3.org]. It must be acknowledged that the standard (i.e correct) is always a capitalized W whenever referring to the World Wide Web in any form, including: Web, Web site, Web page, Web server, etc."

Also,

"6. Somehow global Web standards don't apply to this Wikipedia Web site, or the work of the W3C doesn't apply to what we are doing here.

[Answer]: False. W3C standards are intended for the entire WWW and are globally acknowledged and applied to most sites both public and private. Wikipedia is a public site on the WWW and functions because of W3C standards and protocols (among others). And yes Wikipedia does have published standards, if not a set style manual.

7. Somehow common malpractice in public forums represents justification for further neglect, abuse, or malpractice, particularly abandoning widely accepted standards.

[Answer]: False. All over the Web and in interpersonal communications, there are accelrating occurences of individuals failing to use capitalization, punctuation, or even automated spell-checking. that doesn't make it tolerable acceptable beneficial admirable or even comprehensible does it do you intend to emulate that common practice as well."

So simply because one dictionary (AHD) states that Web site is an acceptable variant of website doesn't necessarily mean that should dictate how it's spelt on the Wikipedia article. ~ UBeR 23:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geopolitics of English-Speaking Europe

I too enjoyed a good, hardy laugh when I came across your response to living in "2 places at the same time" on User talk:72.209.25.80. I thank you for that. And please believe me when I say that all Americans are not that stupid. Wavy G 03:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that has to be an all time vandalism classic . I think I'm going to frame it one my user page. Did you also spot their attempt to create an new userbox? [1]. You can rest assured that I have met some very intelligent Americans in my time and that some youtube kids aren't in any danger of denting the US's reputation. For further giggles I heartily recommend watching their "notable film company"'s latest releases: [2]-- IslaySolomon | talk 04:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallowieners

It was deleted - that was a repost. I've deleted it again, but if you see it reappear let me know and I'll salt it. Cheers, Yomangani ^talk 00:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About this

Actually, the new MW software automatically summarizes a page blank when no other edit summary is used. 68.39.174.238 02:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK, I've seen a LOAD of people and several administrators completely miss that. You're in good company ;D! 68.39.174.238 02:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Addams Family

I've reverted your recent reversion of The Addams Family. Please see Talk:The Addams Family. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jordan Brown (talk • contribs) 18:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

List of Internet phenomena

I made a copy of the last good version of this article at my user space. Feel free to edit this one. JuJube 00:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People who bought Bill Brasky also bought...

Hey, Wavy G! I've noticed that you've kept a watchful eye on Bill Brasky for a long time, making sure it doesn't grow out of control. Kudos! Now, I don't want to give the impression that I'm recruiting for edit wars all over the place, but... you might be interested in Girl next door and Tom Swifties, two other articles consisting mainly of too-long lists in need of trimming and regular maintenance. I tried, but there's only so many times I can delete Rory Gilmore and "I always go last in the gang bang," Tom said forthcomingly before it begins to feel like swimming against the tide. --Quuxplusone 08:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 17:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

AFD

AfD nomination of Junior's Dream Bike

Junior's Dream Bike, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Junior's Dream Bike satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junior's Dream Bike and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Junior's Dream Bike during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. GreenJoe 20:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WavyG.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:WavyG.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Goober Pyle.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Goober Pyle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gomer Pyle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gomer Pyle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Groundhog day

The information you added to the Groundhog day article is probably better left out of the intro (which should generally summarize information already found in the article) but if you want to expand the plot section a bit I'd support that. -- Horkana (talk) 04:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Short-lived recurring characters on Saturday Night Live

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Short-lived recurring characters on Saturday Night Live. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Short-lived recurring characters on Saturday Night Live. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tim O'Hara

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tim O'Hara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 20:05, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Allan Havey

The article Allan Havey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Found only passing mentions, name-drops, and TV guide listings. All cited roles are extremely minor one-shots

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gomer Pyle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gomer Pyle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gomer Pyle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spinixster (chat!) 07:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Goober Pyle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goober Pyle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goober Pyle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spinixster (chat!) 01:13, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John "Hannibal" Smith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John "Hannibal" Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John "Hannibal" Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:47, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]