User talk:Wheatanonymous

Wheatanonymous, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wheatanonymous! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:16, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Triticum compactum erincaceum

I'm just curious as to whether there is enough unique content to warrant Triticum compactum erincaceum as a separate article: if there are only 2 known specimens, it might be best to simply discuss the subspecies at Triticum compactum, rather than direct readers to a stub that says little more than the existing content. Cheers. --Animalparty-- (talk) 19:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Diagram of the rachis segments of Triticum compactum.tiff

Thanks for uploading File:Diagram of the rachis segments of Triticum compactum.tiff. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:34, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Triticum compactum erinaceum

The article Triticum compactum erinaceum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The content of this article is hopelessly confused. Triticum compactum var. erinaceum is a scientific name that has been used in the classification of wheats, but that name is not recognized in recent wheat classifications. The article equates "California Club Wheat" and "Mayview wheat" with Triticum compactum erinaceum, with no support from cited sources. While "California Club Wheat" and "Mayview wheat" are possibly cultivars of Triticum compactum erinaceum (but this isn't explicitly supported by cited sources), they are not both extinct, or disappeared before 1822, or grown in the dust-bowl era, nor have only four recorded specimens. (Sorting out extinct/1822/dust-bowl/four-specimens claims requires untangling uncited claims in this article)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plantdrew (talk) 03:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]