User talk:Whirlwave

Proposed deletion of Prize-O-Matic (toy)

Hello, Whirlwave. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Prize-O-Matic (toy), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Whirlwave, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hwang Shinwei with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hwang Shinwei. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Hwang Shinwei. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Hwang Shinwei. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]