User talk:Wikiwikiperson
Welcome
[edit]I am using this empty section to make you a friendly warning that you may wish to keep on top of your talk page because it could be useful to you in your future participation at Wikipedia. At the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahika Sharma you say you did not create her page, but the history of Mahika Sharma (before Mahika sharma) and the notifications in this page say a different story. You may be her (although I don't think a lady would use the words you used to me) or a fan(atic). I am sure some day Mahika Sharma will be notable and I will -if I may- contribute to develop her bio here because I am sure she will deserve it. In the mean time please inform yourself about WP:CoI and other things like abusing various accounts. Please always be civil and kind to other users. Do not attack them. Enjoy Wikipedia. If you wish you may remove this note or take it to the bottom, but if I were you I would always keep this here, as it will guide you to good. Thanks and welcome again. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Wikiwikiperson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!
Removing AfD template
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mahika sharma. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I NotifyOnline 03:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
[edit] Hello, I'm AsceticRose. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mahika Sharma because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. AsceticRosé 17:26, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion (on the article Navi Bhangu) but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. ansh666 20:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mahika Sharma
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mahika Sharma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BiH (talk) 08:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 16:37, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- The user must also be sanctioned for these words although removed, and those words eliminated from the page history, I believe. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 16:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- The edit can be taken into account if the user continues to be disruptive, but I'm not going to sanction them for the offensive comment.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)