User talk:WikkiBlack

Ken-Fu Nunchaku Jutsu moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Ken-Fu Nunchaku Jutsu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 16:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nunchaku (disambiguation)[edit]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

Disambiguation pages[edit]

Please note that disambiguation pages like Nunchaku (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 00:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Professor Harry Baker, 10th Dan[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Professor Harry Baker, 10th Dan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.tapinto.net/towns/east-orange-slash-orange/sections/sports/articles/martial-arts-masters-become-professors-while-impacting-youth-with-science. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Professor Harry Baker, 10th Dan[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Professor Harry Baker, 10th Dan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Professor Harry Baker, 10th Dan[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Professor Harry Baker, 10th Dan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ken-Fu Nunchaku Jutsu[edit]

Hello, WikkiBlack. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ken-Fu Nunchaku Jutsu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ken-Fu Nunchaku Jutsu[edit]

Hello, WikkiBlack. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ken-Fu Nunchaku Jutsu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Nunchaku. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not promotional material to post fact and certificates of recognition supporting a claim. Ken-Fu Nunchaku Jutsu is a recognized system by some of the very bodies recognized on this wikki page and should be listed by virtue of that recognition. By what rights do you deny and delete same? WikkiBlack (talk) 01:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 13:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikkiBlack (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To whom it may concern or is authority on wikki. Clearly if you look at my last response on this talk page I did not understand why what I was doing was in violation of the rules. In fact I didn't even know the person deleting my edits was a person in authority instead of a random user on the internet that simply didn't like what I had to say. Moreover, I was rather annoyed because I was posting text with certificates as support which I now see is inadequate but didn't know that at the time. By way of background, initially when I posted ken Fu Nunchaku in the nunchaku page, several national/international Nunchaku organizations were listed. I cited to certificates that those very same organizations produced believing incorrectly that was sufficient support for ken fu's inclusion on the page because the organizations themselves were on the page. It would appear that wikki subsequently deleted all of those pre existing organizations which were listed. Upon further research into your rules and regulations it would appear that Ken-FU Nunchaku Jutsu can only be listed as a formal martial arts style on this page if it is worthy of its own wikki page supported by secondary sources like news articles. In this way, its addition to the nunchaku page could refer back to the ken fu wikki page.

I do not have a history of violating wikki policy nor have I been blocked before. So i would apologize for any violation of these rules and state that any violations flowed from a lack of understanding and not a direct attack or effort to subvert the rules. Violating the rules is essentially futile anyway because the text can be deleted and I can be blocked as did occur. Second if my new understanding is correct, and I am unblocked, the process I would follow to address this situation would be to: (1) Create a Ken-Fu Nunchaku Jutsu Page utilizing news paper articles and online media organizations as secondary sources to support its prominence. Then I would be able to place ken fu in the nunchkau page of concern referring back to the newly created ken fu wikki page. If this is an acceptable process, I am also willing to build the ken fu page when I obtain the secondary sources and submit it to the appropriate authority for approval prior to attempting to insert a reference to it on the Nunchaku page at issue. Would that be acceptable? This important to resolve, not just for my benefit of being unblocked but because the Ken Fu system continues to grow in prominence and I don't want others to be blocked for trying to edit wikki for this. I want the information to be put in a compliant manor without anyone else being penalized. Will you help me to do this the right way? If yes, once I obtain the news articles I will build the ken fu page. Thank you in advance your your consideration.WikkiBlack (talk) 19:56, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't have anyone in authority, just some users with extra tools- admins have no more authority than any other editor. As you only seem intersted in promoting this martial art, the block reason is correct, and there are no grounds to remove the block. Please read WP:COI and if you want to edit about topics other than that for which you have a conflict of interest, please tell what. 331dot (talk) 21:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.