User talk:TheHumbugBar

WilliamKingstonCox, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi WilliamKingstonCox! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Empire loyalism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Empire loyalism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empire loyalism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kolbasz (talk) 19:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Qmee.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Qmee.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RollingFace99 (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Empire loyalism. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Qmee.com

I'm rather troubled by your post on this article's talk page that "This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because...in talks with the company in question about the creation of the site.". Wikipedia is not a commercial website, and it is totally improper to try to market services to companies offering to create articles on them. You will be blocked permanently from editing if this occurs again. Please see WP:COI. Nick-D (talk) 10:12, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nick, I think my innocent intentions have been massively over-exaggerated. I have contacted their press team to get information on the founders, Mr Jonathan Knight and Mr Nick Sutton. If simple curiosity is such a crime, then I think the entirety of the situation is hypocritical.

You referred briefly to a permanent block - is this on creating such a page called 'Qmee.com'?

I look forward to receiving further correspondence from yourself.

Will Kingston-Cox

Politicians

Members of Parliament, however little information we have about them, are deemed notable. See: WP:POLITICIAN. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kifah Al-Mutawa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 22:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Adotchar (talk) 10:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 10:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) In light of the worrying comment I noted above and the articles on marginally notable (at best) firms you've been continuing to create which have been written in a promotional tone, it appears that you are engaging in editing involving an undisclosed conflict of interest. From your response to my warning it seems that this behaviour is unlikely to cease, and that you don't currently understand Wikipedia's rules around it. Nick-D (talk) 10:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock | reason=Please may I have a comprehensive list of where I have promoted any such business and then followed up with the appropriate policy and/or guideline which I have broken. Utterly appalled at how this has happened. [[User:TheHumbugBar|TheHumbugBar]] ([[User talk:TheHumbugBar#top|talk]]) 10:54, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

{{unblock | reason=Please may I have a comprehensive list of where I have promoted any such business and then followed up with the appropriate policy and/or guideline which I have broken. Utterly appalled at how this has happened.}}TheHumbugBar (talk) 10:55, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the warning above. Nick-D (talk) 10:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I personally feel that I have been unfairly subject to an indefinite ban. As I researched, an infinite ban is for the most severe threats to Wikipedia. I do not see how going on the FTSE SmallCap Index and creating pages, which the creator obviously deemed notable as he had put them in '[[example]]'. Please look back on the history logs. Where is the advertisement? I would like this resolved today, if possible albeit at least a definite block of x days. [[User:TheHumbugBar|TheHumbugBar]] ([[User talk:TheHumbugBar#top|talk]]) 13:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheHumbugBar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I personally feel that I have been unfairly subject to an indefinite ban. As I researched, an infinite ban is for the most severe threats to Wikipedia. I do not see how going on the FTSE SmallCap Index and creating pages, which the creator obviously deemed notable as he had put them in 'example'. Please look back on the history logs. Where is the advertisement? I would like this resolved today, if possible albeit at least a definite block of x days.

Decline reason:

You have now been re-blocked due to the abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 12:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TheHumbugBar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16786 was submitted on Oct 27, 2016 13:38:01. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TheHumbugBar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16789 was submitted on Oct 27, 2016 14:48:15. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]