User talk:William Qwest

Recent edit to Brandon Lee[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! - Cwobeel (talk) 03:38, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 08:05, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Salma Hayek with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 09:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shi Yan Ming may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:44, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Big Trouble in Little China. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhD (talk) 19:48, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lorraine Bracco. SummerPhD (talk) 19:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

William Qwest, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi William Qwest! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 02:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kung fu films[edit]

If you feel a film belongs in this category, add [[Category:Kung fu films]] to the bottom of the film's article. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Genres for Hard Target[edit]

Could you see the talk page for Hard Target to discuss genre additions? Thanks Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:54, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hard Target. The categories you are repeatedly adding need to be cited in the article, otherwise they will continue to be removed. If you don't understand, please discuss the issues on the articles' talk pages. SummerPhD (talk) 03:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]