User talk:Wisguyglobal

October 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 21:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Andrew Witty, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 15:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Andrew Witty, you may be blocked from editing. Dormskirk (talk) 21:35, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Electric vehicle. MrOllie (talk) 00:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

these are plain facts and not poorly sourced. where do you live?Wisguyglobal (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even 'plain facts' must carry citations. MrOllie (talk) 00:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason= I've introduced a reference about plug in electric vehilces. this is a reliable reference. did you read it? [[User:Wisguyglobal|Wisguyglobal]] ([[User talk:Wisguyglobal#top|talk]]) 01:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)}}

{{unblock|reason=These have the advantage of being recharged at night time, when the electric grid is underutilized, thereby reducing wastage of electricity, improving energy efficiency and reducing air and noise pollution. (ref https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/electricity_charging_home.html) [[User:Wisguyglobal|Wisguyglobal]] ([[User talk:Wisguyglobal#top|talk]]) 01:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)}}

{{unblock|reason=this reference is form a US Govt source, i.e. most reliable. you are welcome to read it, understand it and reformat it. [[User:Wisguyglobal|Wisguyglobal]] ([[User talk:Wisguyglobal#top|talk]]) 01:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)}}

One open unblock request at a time, please. You had three separate requests. --Yamla (talk) 01:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you are welcome to read all three together since these are really short comments, and say the same thing.

Also, editors should know that these sources are reliable and general knowledge.thank you. Wisguyglobal (talk) 02:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my comments can be found on other wikipedia pages and are referenced there adequately already. e.g. electric cars.Wisguyglobal (talk) 02:20, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wisguyglobal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please read the Wikipedia page on electric cars. then look at the changes made to the Wikipedia page on electric vehicles. You will see the similarity and maybe understand that the editors objections were baseless and false.Wisguyglobal (talk) 06:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This block is about your actions, not the merits of your edits; your edits were poorly sourced and disrupted the flow of the article, and you edit warred to preserve them instead of discussing the matter on the talk page. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wisguyglobal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Nothing wrong with my edits or actions. The source was from the US Govt, Dept of Energy. Very credible source for everyone, also for all readers of Wikipedia. please read the Wikipedia page on electric cars. then look at the changes made to the Wikipedia page on electric vehicles. You will see the similarity and maybe understand that the editors objections were baseless and false.Wisguyglobal (talk) 09:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you do not understand why your actions were disruptive, then it's clear to me at this block is still required to prevent disruption. stwalkerster (talk) 09:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wisguyglobal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are welcome to ask the owners of electric vehicles if they disagree or agree with my edits to electric vehicles. Why don't you make these edits yourself, by just copying from the Wiki page on electric cars? That's not difficult for you.Wisguyglobal (talk) 10:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's not how this works. See WP:CITE and WP:RS and WP:NOR. Nor does this address your disruptive edits outside of electric vehicles. Yamla (talk) 11:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wisguyglobal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please visit the auto-garage and ask them. Wisguyglobal (talk) 14:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It seems that you have reverted some scientific comments on the carbon cycle, even though you are not experts in the field. And other edits also. very unprofessional i must say. this is not an encyclopaedia. Wisguyglobal (talk) 14:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]