User talk:WrightyTighty

April 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Doherty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 23:10, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Doherty. Bbb23 (talk) 23:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I did not vandalize anything. I was updating to wiki page since the person is famous look up Jack Doherty. Can you please review the page you will see I'm telling the truth WrightyTighty (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And isn't fair since I lost all my work I spent the past 3 hours typing can you please review it and revert back to my page? Thanks WrightyTighty (talk) 23:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Jack Doherty page is not about the YouTuber. It's a list of people called Jack Doherty with articles at Wikipedia. Effectively, your edits hijacked an existing page and transformed it into something else. To create a page about the YouTuber, you'd have to create a new page that distinguishes Jack Doherty the YouTuber from other Jack Dohertys. And I wouldn't do so because it's clear that you are not sufficiently competent to create a page at Wikipedia. I suggest you find another website to play around in, not Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"sufficiently competent" you don't have to be a jerk about it -_- WrightyTighty (talk) 00:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

just another administrator abusing his powers smh WrightyTighty (talk) 00:11, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Too Lost[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Too Lost requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 19:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Too Lost for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Too Lost is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Too Lost until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I believe this page should not be deleted and here's why. Too Lost is a music distribution company that has became very popular in the music music distribution community having over 75.000 artist using it. I created the page since the company did not have a wikipedia page and wanted to contribute to publish more info about the company. I provided all the necessary credit and did research on the company to verify all information. I'm very passionate about music and believe everything posted is credible and plan to publish more information about the company. WrightyTighty (talk) 02:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also for the first article I posted that was blacklisted was made by mistake and corrected the error once I found out it was blacklisted. There were no outlandish claims being made in those news articles and merlin has confirmed that Too Lost is a partner WrightyTighty (talk) 02:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the section WP:ORGCRIT carefully. If you can find and include the sources described in that section, that would be helpful. Without the independent secondary reliable in-depth sources, the organization is not notable, regardless of how interesting or deserving the organization is. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Too Lost[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Too Lost has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.newswire.com/news/too-lost-joins-merlin-to-secure-best-deal-terms-from-spotify-tencent-21298045. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. — Diannaa (talk) 22:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, WrightyTighty! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality[edit]

Hi WrightyTighty, describing a living person as "brutally honest" in the lead section of an article isn't really compatible with Wikipedia's neutrality requirements. I see that the content you have replaced may have more severe issues, or may have been problematic for other reasons, so I can clearly understand why you did so, but I wanted to make sure you are aware that the replacement "brutally honest" isn't optimal in any case. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:22, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm FrederalBacon. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Andrew Tate, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FrederalBacon (talk) 18:38, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because the sexual assault claims were proven to be false should not be in the lead section it should be in the Controversies section WrightyTighty (talk) 18:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Kessler (artist) ‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 02:19, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

You commented on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/December_15,_2022_Twitter_suspensions with the following:

Wikipedia is overly controlled by mainstream media. delete this trash

Referring to an article as "trash" is unconstructive. Referring to Wikipedia as being "overly controlled by mainstream media" is off topic and unsubstantiated. Your comment violates a number of talk page guidelines, specifically: be positive, stay objective, deal with facts, and stay on topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fogsparrow (talk • contribs) 17:21, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]