User talk:XGustaX
Language boxes
[edit]Oh, those things? You can get them here: Wikipedia:Babel -- just follow the instructions and pick out all the ones you like. --[User:HappyCamper|HappyCamper] (UTC)
Okay thank you I apperricate it (XGustaX 20:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC))
Not really sure (XGustaX 20:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC))
Excellent article! Hope to see more about European immigrants in Argentina! =) --CrazyAmerican 16:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry for taking so long. The article was tagged by Marianocecowski (talk · contribs) as a "direct copyvio" of http://www.nordicway.com/argentina.htm. Sincerely I don't see what's the problem here, the website provided doesn't state any exclusive rights, and in my opinion this is not copyright infringement. Also it should be noted that Wikipedia itself encourages editors to create and improve new articles, you know, META:ACP, WP:BOLD, WP:IAR, etc., so why this article cannot be on Wikipedia?
- Homever, I think you must contact Nordicway.com and ask for permission. If this cannot be obtained you can always reword most of the page or, of course, include this information on other articles (Argentina, Buenos Aires) and then cite this website as a source, but it's up to you. Hope this helps mate, I don't want to loss this wonderful article! Goodbye. --CrazyAmerican 04:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations!
[edit]
For your amazing work on Swedish, Norwegian and European immigrants in Argentina, and in general for all your contributions in Wikipedia, I respectfully award you the Argentine Barnstar of National Merit. Have a good day mate! —NihilAliudScitNecessitasQuamVincere 02:54, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism
[edit]Please, removing inportant anti-vandalism information from anonymous users is considered vandalism. Mariano(t/c) 11:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppets
[edit]I have reason to believe that the following are accounts created by you in order to vote several times for page deletions: FR-Altas, Celto, Forhonor and IIIV. I am basing this on the following observations:
- The similar signature of the above users' posts in the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Largest_empires page.
- The brevity of the contribution history of the above users.
- The similar edit patterns, e.g.
- Similarity in the standard of English used in posts. (Although far superior to my foreign language skills, it is obviously not that of a native English speaker).
If I have mistakenly accused you then I sincerely and completely apologise. I look forward to hearing your response. Gsd2000 17:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry I meant FR-Altas re the Costa Rica edits. Gsd2000 18:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Removals and edit summaries
[edit]Just a little advice... When you change figures and especially when you remove information, please do explain why, or on what grounds (regarding Wikipedia policies, sources, etc.) you did that. For example this was not "wrong" — it was a debatable opinion (falls under WP:NOR). And this was not vandalism or obviously incorrect, so you really should summarize it with more than simply "revert". Here you called the same content "vandalism" when it clearly is not. Other editors can understandably take issue with these removals and with you.
Since you've been working on certain controversial fields (and removing sensitive information), you really really should make yourself clear in all cases, except when you're doing something minor like correcting a typo or a very obvious mistake. If the edit summary is not long enough, use the talk page. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 12:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Are you making fun of me? I've just tagged User:24.60.174.79 as yet another suspected sockpuppet of you for the mess he/you made in Argentina. I should block you right now for evading blocks and 3RR, but I'll wait a bit more. If any of "you guys" does anything, you'll all be blocked. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 19:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Sockpuppetting again? XGustaX should be permanently banned. Gsd2000 23:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Removing vandalism info again
[edit]I'm getting seriously tired of you and your puppets and your racist comments. Must be patience thins with age. Your last removal of vandalism info and your attempt to bait me were strikes one and two. One more, and I will block you. Consider yourself warned. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 18:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
~hey
[edit]No, I am Argentine. You speak swedish? I started clases last tuesday :D. Do you have msn? --Dexter_prog (talk • contribs • count) @ 01:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Yeah I read your user page. My ancestry is italian, I guess. I am interested in all nordic languages and Swedish was the one most available here, besides it is similar to norwegian and danish, so that's great. My msn is: the_secret_phoenix@hotmail.com add me. Hej då --Dexter_prog (talk • contribs • count) @ 12:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Restaurantaleman.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Restaurantaleman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Ok thanks. (XGustaX 01:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC))
Follow up
[edit]Sorry for my tardiness. I think the IP has stopped; in any case, I am not sure if there is anything which is actionable at the moment. If it happens again, I suggest taking it to WP:AN - I think I'll be a bit busy with some other things on Wikipedia for the time being, and you would get a much quicker response there. HTH. --HappyCamper 01:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
May I ask why did you revert my edits in Argentina? For the record, I'm an Argentine. I would never vandalize the article. Nat91 00:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Editing
[edit]Please, try to preview your edits to avoid making several versions of the same page, and provide edit summaries when editing a page. Than you, --Mariano(t/c) 00:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
You claim to be editing images out but you are deleting valid text that was added at the same time. What is your rationale for deleting the historical information about Eva Perón? Corto 22:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
I am sorry Corto I did not, I must have mis-read what they added I thought they just moved it and added more pictures. I will change it now. Thanks, Good wiking,!(XGustaX 23:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC))
Tone
[edit]Yout tone of voice is very rude and is not permitted on Wikipedia. Please refrain from doing this any more you have been warned. I have also warned User:Mariokempes and the two of you should just back down. (DoubleNine 18:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC))
- This is funny... I'm glad you have a good sense of humour! Mariokempes 22:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Can't help myself- you're a great source of entertainment! No hard feelings. ciao. Mariokempes 23:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Mestizo, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Greeves (talk • contribs • reviews) 00:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please, you already know you mustn't erase good-faith warnings. Don't do that anymore. Twice. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:26, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Removal category deletion opposition
[edit] Please do not delete responses to Categories Nominated for Deletion, as you did to. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Relir 21:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Stop doing that. This is the second or third time I have to restore valid warnings on your talk page. If you erase warnings like the above again, you will be blocked. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Blocked for One Week
[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by continuing to falsely claim vandalism in edit summaries as well as violations of WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. The duration of the block is one week due to repeated warnings over conduct. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. [1]--Jersey Devil 04:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Sockpuppets?
[edit]I have reason to believe 24.60.175.168 (talk · contribs) is you, based on the latest edits on Demographics of Argentina and the fact that it's in the same range as your (other) sockpuppets. I noticed you deleted a couple of ethnic minorities from the article while you "reverted vandalism", too. This is the last warning you're going to get; next time you use a sockpuppet, both of you will be blocked. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 13:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
3rr
[edit]WP:3RR, you are in violation of the 3rr rule for reverting the Race and geneticsMuntuwandi 05:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
There is no need to disprove your source because studies in mtDNA are widespread and they are not stopping. your source is taking a more political viewpoin than a scientific one see WP:FRINGE. Mainstream science accepts studies involving mtDNA. Wikipedia accepts reliable sources, it is vandalism to remove reliably sourced scientific material.Muntuwandi 02:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- If you continue to edit war at any article, you may receive a temporary block. Please engage in discussion on article talk pages instead of engaging in edit wars. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Collaboration
[edit]Reading the talk page I see the other editor has made several attempts at a compromise. I stand by my decision of protecting teh article. This is a collaborative environment and often compromise is a crucial concept to keep things flowing smoothly. Looking at the talk page I see the other editor has attempted to discuss it with you and as stated before reach a compromise which you seemed to have no interest in. This is a content dispute, nothing more. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- I am sorry that I will not respond via email. This discussion is not regarding personal information or a highly sentisitve discussion. I prefer keep these discussions on wiki. I am also very selective of who i Email as it is not a wiki only account, again my apologies. Life is not black and white, reach a compromise that is all I ask. IT appears he is willing to work on a compromise, go work it out together. Good luck. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
OK far enough. XGustaX 20:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]You have been blocked for abusive sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/XGustaX. You may return to make constructive edits after your block expires. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 17:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism in the Argentinian article
[edit]After we discussed our setion forever... (an user has been modificating the demographic's section accoding to his/her piacere for weeks now). I explained him/her nicely why our section was more accurated, and the misunderstanding information he/she posted, I told him/her to please he checked our previous discussion in the "Achives" (even when i hardly sign my comments). But he/she doesn't even bother in answered me (well he/she dis answer you once in a really unproper way), and it changes it again.
Pablo and Mariano are on vacations and I can't sent messages to all the Argentinians users that I remember has been working in this fine section for ages!.
So please, i reverted now but take a lok at this user or write him a message.
Greetings, O. Lynch —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.16.20.42 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:User Swedish ancestry
[edit]Wikipedia:User Swedish ancestry, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:User Swedish ancestry and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:User Swedish ancestry during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. c y m r u . l a s s (talk me, stalk me) 01:07, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
GamerGate Sanctions Notice
[edit]
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.- Cheers. --Jorm (talk) 19:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
BLP sanctions notice
[edit]Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Gamaliel (talk) 18:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Christina Hoff Sommers
[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. To which I will add that you have already violated 3RR at the article. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 21:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, XGustaX. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, XGustaX. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)