User talk:Xermano

Rights moved

Per your request I moved your permissions User:Akifumii is now operating under account User:Xermano (see Special:Diff/620656849). Please ping my talk page regarding the education program settings. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:06, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

• eponline re-added; you will need to recreate your ep profile via Special:OnlineVolunteerProfile. Happy editing, — xaosflux ^Talk 18:22, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
• WP:AWB moved as well Special:Diff/620666457. — xaosflux ^Talk 18:31, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Xermano, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 16:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Afro-Eurasian

Csak, hogy tudd, egy újat tervezgetek. Szerintem marha fontos lenne, hogy reagálj. Borsoka (talk) 17:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

(Translation: Only for your information: I am planning a new one [=a new sock-puppet investigation, in reference to my remark here at 17:00 on 11.08.2014]. I think your reaction is highly important. Borsoka (talk) 18:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC))

Please stop bothering me about this. See the discussion on xaosflux's talk page. The reason why I started a new account was because I wanted to have a fresh start. Have questions? Xermano (talk) 17:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Dehogy akarlak zavarni. Csak kellene valamit válaszolnod. Nem kell mindig új életet kezdeni. Borsoka (talk) 17:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

(Translation: I do not want to bother you. You should only answer anything. You do not always need to start a new life. Borsoka (talk) 18:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC))

That SPI case has been closed. If you need anything, let me know. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

@Xaosflux: Does that mean there is nothing against me? Do you know what is going on? Xermano (talk) 23:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

That case was closed, the suspicion was that someone (suggested to be you) was the same person responsible for edits as User:Afro-Eurasian. The case has been closed without additional action. Assuming you never actually edited as User:Afro-Eurasian, then there is nothing to worry about. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Csak tájékoztatlak, hogy nem tervezek új eljárást. Nem kell megint új életet kezdened. Ugyan szerintem marha nagy hiba volt így lezárni az ügyet, de a "szabály az szabály". Borsoka (talk) 03:55, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

(Translation: I only inform you that I am not planning to initiate a new procedure [=investigation]. You do not need to start a new life again. Although I think that the closing of the case was a great mistake, but "a rule is a rule". Borsoka (talk) 18:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC))

Szerintem felesleges fárasztanunk Armbrust-t, mivel te kitünően beszélsz magyarul. Sőt, én kifejezetten ellenzem, hogy harmadik fél fordítsa le a fenti üzeneteimet. Borsoka (talk) 06:49, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

(Translation: I think we should not bother Armbrust, because you excellently speak Hungarian. Actually, I am definitely opposed to the translation of my above messages by a third part. Borsoka (talk) 18:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC))

Hungarian conversation

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:15, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hungarian conversation 2

Szia Xermano. Most oszinten, tenyleg beszeled a magyar nyelvet, vagy ez csak valami trukkozes? Ha beszeled ezt a gyonyoru nyelvet, akkor kerlek tiszteld meg a fentiekben hozzaszolo magyar szerkesztotarsadat egy szimpla egyszeru magyar nyelvu valasszal. Koszonom Fakirbakir (talk) 08:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Elnézést

Elnézésedet kell kérnem, hogy azt hittem, hogy te Afro-Eurasian kis kezesbábja vagy, de már látom, hogy az angolod nem elég jó ahhoz, hogy magyar szövegeket fordíts. Nem baj, az enyém is szörnyű. Mindenesetre tényleg szükség lenne segítségre sok-sok szócikknél, mivel kevesen maradtunk a történelem iránt érdeklődő magyar szerkesztők. Ha neked lenne szükséged valamilyen támogatásra, nyugodtan jelezd akár nekem, akár Fakirbakirnak. A magyar közösségben megszokott, hogy anyanyelvünkön kommunikálunk egymás lapján, nem lenne szép felborítani ezt a hagyományt. Legyen szép napod! Borsoka (talk) 17:19, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Köszönöm. Xermano^Talk 17:50, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Afro-Eurasian

FYI. For you have not proved that you can speak in Hungarian, I am again sure that you are identical with the Hungarophobe, Russophobe, anti-Zianist, etc. banned user Afro-Eurasian. Borsoka (talk) 16:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:59, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xermano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi fellow admins. I understand why I have been blocked. I deceived and let down the Wikipedia community by having fake credentials on my userpage as well as "lying" while editing. I understand that I was not here to build an encyclopedia but to lie and deceive. I know this hurt the Wikipedia community and strongly apologize for my actions. I have read Wikipedia:Here_to_build_an_encyclopedia and promise to follow these guidelines as well as all of the other Wikipedia policies. Even after this block, I evaded the block by creating a new account User:Umafiy because I wanted to start fresh as well as honest. Apparently, I didn't read the part about evading blocks and got blocked on Umafiy as well. After being unblocked, I plan to join Wikiprojects, add content to articles, fight vandalism, do wikignome work again, etc. I do not plan to lie, vandalize, or deceive the Wikipedia community. I confirm that I will not ever do this again. I just want to start fresh. Thank you for your time. I appreciate it. Xermano^Talk 16:01, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You've also used multiple accounts. Before an unblock can be contemplated, you will need to provide a complete list of accounts you have created. PhilKnight (talk) 20:56, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xermano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi fellow admins. I understand why I have been blocked. I deceived and let down the Wikipedia community by having fake credentials on my userpage as well as "lying" while editing. I understand that I was not here to build an encyclopedia but to lie and deceive. I know this hurt the Wikipedia community and strongly apologize for my actions. I have read Wikipedia:Here_to_build_an_encyclopedia and promise to follow these guidelines as well as all of the other Wikipedia policies. Even after this block, I evaded the block by creating a new account User:Umafiy because I wanted to start fresh as well as honest. Apparently, I didn't read the part about evading blocks and got blocked on Umafiy as well. After being unblocked, I plan to join Wikiprojects, add content to articles, fight vandalism, do wikignome work again, etc. I do not plan to lie, vandalize, or deceive the Wikipedia community. I confirm that I will not ever do this again. I just want to start fresh. Thank you for your time. I appreciate it. I have created *User:Akifumii *User:AkiAmano (legit alt of Akifumii) *User:Xermano *User:Umafiy Xermano^Talk 22:06, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I've declined your unblock request as the editing community has lost faith in your statements. You've only been blocked for a short while and already had two unblock requests. I recommend that you should wait, at least 6 months, before requesting unblocking again. Find somewhere else to contribute positively, for 6 months and show the community that you have changed and will not make the same mistakes again. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:06, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You didn't know about block evasion? I don't believe you. Even if it were true, it doesn't explain why you say some of the things you say on the sock's user page. You're no longer Canadian. You're now American? I know this is harsh - and some might even say intemperate - but I think you're a pathological liar, and I would never be in favor of unblocking you, and certainly not this soon after everything you've done.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

I am American and understand that I am not Canadian. All of my accounts are a lie except User:Umafiy. I had fake credentials on Akifumii and Xermano to try and get rights, more edits, and popularity on Wikimedia before even thinking about how it could harm the community. I understand how serious this is and promise not to lie on Wikimedia again. I sincerely apologize for my actions. Xermano^Talk 02:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Akifumii/Xermano's promise and apology are both worthless. I wasted my time teaching them under the auspices of CVUA, at their request. Because of that, I foolishly defended them from harassment and this gutless coward didn't bother coming clean even when I took the issue to ANI. I don't doubt that Akifumii/Xermano will be making another sock shortly if they haven't already and I want them to leave Wikipedia or forever risk being caught and chased off. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

I just want one last chance and the only chance here. Although it takes time, I want to gain the trust back from the community. I won't screw it up ever again. Xermano^Talk 05:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

I would also like to acknowledge that vandalizing a wiki is as bad as lying. I understand that the community is disappointed in me. I won't ever let them down again. Xermano^Talk 14:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

I am also joining a list of admins who pledged to never support any future unblocking on your account. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 07:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)