User talk:Xinit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

EL to ROIR[edit]

Please read [WP:VAND]. I read the article you suggested and I get your poorly made point. Now you will stop overreacting and leave me alone, as we are done. --Nick (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Nardwuar[edit] know Nardwuar? That's pretty cool. I'm not sure where I got the thing about Sum 41, I must have misremembered something. Adam Bishop 22:44, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Thanks for doing the revert on that Philosophy section... I was going to let it sit for a couple hours before I'd have reverted myself - mostly to avoid a revert fight. Xinit 00:39, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

No problem, same thing happened to me yesterday. The POV has been freaking driving me up the wall. maxcap 00:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

If you are going to remove the film/tv, insisting they should be in the band member's pages instead, then why not add them to those individual pages instead of just removing them from the RHCP page? --Mattarata 14:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Something Green and Leafy[edit]

What makes you nominate Something Green And Leafy This Way Comes for speedy deletion and not the other half-dozen album stubs I created for this same band?

  1. Because it was a very short article providing little or no context (CSD A1)
  2. Because I didn't notice the other stubs.
  3. Because, in your hurried cut-and-paste, you couldn't even be bothered to match the article title with the first sentence of the so-called stub.

--Calton | Talk 04:46, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Holy Shiite[edit]

At the times that I deleted it, the article had no text whatsoever. That means it was empty. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


About what you said on my talk page: I do use the term Randist, but not as a personal attack. The term is meant to be an "unloaded" term to replace the loaded term "Objectivists". It isn't a matter of insulting, but a matter of using neutral terminology. I do this not to insult anyone, but to make sure nobody - whether it's them or me - is insulted when refering to their ideology. -- LGagnon 15:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah... it strikes me as an odd approach aimed at silencing opposition. I'm mostly curious what the "attacks" are in your statements, as I do not see it. Perhaps it's like the Star Trek fans who don't like being called "Trekkies"? -- Xinit 15:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Re:RHCP EL[edit]

Honestly, I'm kind of conflicted as well. It is ad heavy, and tour dates aren't absolutely necessary as part of a biography, but I was hoping that kind of fluff might help placate the fanboys (but it probably won't) maxcap 19:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


I appreciate your help with disputes, but it's best if you post comments for others to their own talk pages, as they are not likely to look at comments on my talk page. Thanks. -- LGagnon 20:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Cult category[edit]

Oh, I know it'll anger them; I'm just not concerned if I anger them or not, given that they will vandalize and make personal attacks anyways. -- LGagnon 21:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


excuse me why are you getting involved in all this? you are really not helping are you? i am really not happy at all! and why are you getting everyone to look at my user page huh? Touth 02:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

i just dont like what you put on that talk page. if you dont want me to get rid of it then i want you to get rid of it. now leave me alone....sob....sob....Touth 04:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

I won't listen to you and get rid of it, because you won't listen to anyone. --Xinit 04:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

and why did you call me a puppy?

I didn't... go read that again. --Xinit 04:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

External links[edit]

Go right ahead. Good to know I'm not the only EL-nazi around here. Add {{User external links}} to your user page aswell if you want, it will give you a little.

External.svg This user is against excessive use of external links.

Good luck! Havok (T/C/c) 21:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Green Day citations[edit]

I've been planning to add citations for a while, and I've done some preliminary work before. A good bet if you want to verify stuff is to check out fansites, which tend to reprint full articles. If they provide the appropriate info (author, title, date, publication, etc.) those can be added as references. WesleyDodds 01:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


You might want to personally ask members of the Alternative Wikiproject to check out and contribute to the COTW page, particularly asking them if there's anything they might wnat to nominate to work on. WesleyDodds 00:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


Thanks! Oh, and I don't know if you started thoses pages on the newer FLA albums, but I think the infoboxes are supposed to be orange. Let me know what you think! The-dissonance-reports 03:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

PS - You seem to have a lot of experiences with external links...I've worked pretty hard on the page for the industrial band X Marks the Pedwalk, maybe you could take a look at that section of the page? :) I'm more concerned with the references section than anything! The-dissonance-reports 03:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Re:Check This[edit]

Hilarious. He's a passionate guy, you've got to give him that. maxcap 19:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Maybe just coincidence maxcap 21:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

dayglo abortions[edit]

as per your additions to the Dayglo Abortions discography, keep in mind that the proper form for an article is to have the content on top, and categories and stub sorting on the bottom. also, all articles need some kind of introductory sentence. Joeyramoney 21:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Green Day vandalism[edit]

Hey, you might want to watch out for edits by User: on the Green day page. This user constantly changes the genre links so they actually redirect to Modern rock and power pop while the text still says Punk rock and Pop punk. This user has also made posts on the talk page that seem biased against the band. WesleyDodds 22:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

CoTW Revisited[edit]

Hey, I asked WesleyDodds if the Alternative music collaboration of the week page was still going, and this was his response:

"Oh, basically we were deadlocked for a while and it kind of fell to the wayside. However, now that we have a clear idea of what to wrk on, maybe we can get it going. Xinit was the one who set it up; you should message him as to how to organize this. WesleyDodds 21:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)"

So, do you think we can get it going again? Or do you wanna scrap it? --Reaper X TC 23:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Synesthesia article[edit]

Hi, I am a bit puzzled by the rv you made on the article [1]. Was it a wrong manipulation or did I get something wrong? Regards, -- lucasbfr talk 22:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok I got it, the previous anonymous user had already reversed the vandalism (twice), and you rolled back his revert in fact ;) See you! -- lucasbfr talk 22:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: The Pixies[edit]

Agreed. By all means, you go for it. However, with the redirect Pixies (band) as it is, that move might require further assistance, namely from an Wikipedian Administrator. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have disambiguation to do. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 00:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

I have reverted my edit back, having placed the info in the article about the artist who names Pixies as an influence. PT (s-s-s-s) 22:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

I Am Spoonbender[edit]

I thought it might be. That's why I added the notability tag and not the speedy delete one. Good luck with the writing. Cheers, Augustus Rookwood 21:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I've tried adding a little bit to the IAS article. Maybe I can add a bit more sometime in the future, since I think they deserve it, but I work glacially slow and am trying to fight a computer addiction, so... well... I probably won't accomplish much. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 02:32, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music and sources[edit]

As part of the Alternative music WikiProject, we're gathering a list of sources on this page. Could you take a look and perhaps add any written references you have access to? Thanks! CloudNine 09:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Voltaire name section[edit]

What? Why on Earth have you removed it? It is relevent, and sourced. It deserves a place in the article, whether or not his real name has been revealed. On the other hand, it will need editing now his real name has been revealed- as I say, I am the only person reguarly editing it, and I haven't really had the motivation to do anything with it for a while. J Milburn 20:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok, cool, I'll leave you to it then. All's well that ends well! I will join you in the cleanup process at some point, but not now. J Milburn 20:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

'Real proof' of Voltaire's name[edit]

I am not quite sure what you mean. I honestly can't think of a better source for his real name, short of government documents. This is the only employment he is under in which he is not 'Voltaire', and so the only reliable (public access) place we can find his name. What are you proposing? J Milburn 22:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

multi dimensional awareness[edit]

it means that the kids can see into ( well, see into is a simplified example) other realities, other earths where humans (or at least human like things) live the idea stems from that they are sometimes thought to come from other realities...( i been reading a lot)Charred Feathers 01:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

NPOV tags to Structural Integration and Rolfing[edit]

Hi Xinit, you recently added tags to the above two articles. The tags include a statement and a request,"The neutrality of this article or section is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page." I look forward to you beginning the discusions mentioned as at present your reasons for the tags are not indicated in your edit summs or on the discussion pages. SmithBlue

Image permission problem with Image:Snoop-nardwuar.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Snoop-nardwuar.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 17:09, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for November 2008[edit]

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 20 - November 2008
"I had access to the most quality fanny available." - Jarvis Cocker
Project news
New members

A Stop at Willoughby and Trap The Drum Wonder joined the alternative music fold during November.



SoxBot II (talk) 02:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for December 2008[edit]

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 21 - December 2008
"Anthony's a sex symbol. You see the thing is for the girls they're like 'oh Anthony he's so beautiful! And his muscles and his hair and oh golly he's so sexy!' but with me its like [with men] 'DUDE YOU'RE SO AWESOME...WOW DUDE. WOW!" - Flea
Project news
New members

Papa November and S. Dean Jameson joined the alternative music fold during December.



SoxBot II (talk) 17:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


Good catch on ghost hunting. [2]. I slipped up there. Thank you. --TS 16:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


I need to understand why you keep removing the edits I keep making. This needs to be on the Rolfing page: Only graduates of the Rolf Institute can be referred to as Rolfers, Certified Rolfers and Advanced Certified Rolfers. I have stopped trying to enforce the service marks. But we legally own these terms and the public needs to know that when the term Rolfer is used, it is just not anyone who has gone through structural integration training - like at the Guild or Hellerwork.

I could do this another way. I could add it to the sentence "The term Rolfing is a registered trademark of the Rolf Institute of Boulder Colorado." to become "The terms Rolfing and Rolfer are a registered trademark of the Rolf Institute of Boulder Colorado." Would that be better?

Please tell me your complaint so I can add what I need to legally without it being removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for February 2009[edit]

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 23 - February 2009
"I want to find the guy that invented compression and tear his liver out. I hate it. It makes everything sound like a beer commercial." - Steve Albini
Project news
New members

MikeGruz and Blackadam2 joined the alternative music fold during February.



SoxBot II (talk) 03:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for March 2009[edit]

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 24 - March 2009
"I got a lot of shit for the Rolling Stone review of Reckoning because the guy really likes my guitar style and he wrote, 'on this record, Pete Buck does everything.' We'd stop for gas and it would be, 'Pete Buck does everything. Why don't you go pump the gas, Pete?'" - Peter Buck
Project news
New members

LizParker and Cavie78 joined the alternative music fold during March.



SoxBot II (talk) 02:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for April 2009[edit]

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 25 - April 2009
"The other day I had these Jehovah's Witnesses come round to my house, and they tried to convince me that the Pope was the Devil's representative on Earth. So I told them that Jesus was the world's first communist. So they left. They were genuinely enraged.'" - Ian Brown
Project news


SoxBot (talk) 10:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Canadian hardcore punk[edit]

I've started an article on Canadian hardcore punk if you're interested in helping. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 14:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for May 2009[edit]

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 26 - May 2009
"Well, I remember hearing girls behind me in English class talking about turning 18 and being old enough to strip. It wasn't that weird at the time.'" - Brandon Flowers
Project news


SoxBot (talk) 10:49, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for June 2009[edit]

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 27 - June 2009
"The only confusion was, I think we all thought they were women. Kim was obviously a woman, but they all had this shaved-headed, pretty, soft look. And there were lots of lesbian bands at the time, and we always got booked with them, so we just thought the Pixies were another, like maybe they were like angry divorcees or somthing that formed a band.'" - Kristin Hersh
Project news


SoxBot (talk) 22:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for July 2009[edit]

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 28 - July 2009
"I rip off more fuckin' people than anyone in the world. I rip off my own rip-offs." - Jared Followill
Project news
New members

Guitarherochristopher and Andrzejbanas joined the alternative music fold during July.



SoxBot (talk) 08:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for August 2009[edit]

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 29 - August 2009
"We've been having lots of sex, and we're pregnant with the new baby already. It's vicious! It will have claws, like Freddy Kruger's lovechild.'" - Tom Meighan
Project news
New members

Dylan620, SteelersFan UK06, Guitarherochristopher and Thatguykalem joined the alternative music fold during August.



SoxBot (talk) 15:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Death Race2000 Album.jpg[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:Death Race2000 Album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC)