User talk:Yellowmockingbird

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edits you made to Expo 2012, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wickedjacob (talk) 01:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Home system, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Home system was changed by Yellowmockingbird (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-05-21T01:53:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:53, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at François Genoud. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you! -- Abel (talk) 15:41, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Darwood Kaye

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Darwood Kaye, you may be blocked from editing.

Keith D (talk) 21:29, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The theory of woodchucking

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The theory of woodchucking requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:49, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Gay Comix because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 16:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]