User talk:Yoko santoso

Welcome!

Hello, Yoko santoso, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! VegaDark 01:20, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

recent edits

If you are going to put edits like recent ones about chinese ancestry that is quite offensive to some readers (even if it is true) - you need to have refs or cites for those Satu Suro 12:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also - sunan ampel article has no category or project tag on the talk page or any indication that it is a stub - do you want help? Satu Suro 12:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wali sanga

Thanks for your efforts on these. But we really need to have sources cited. Technically, any unverified work can be removed. See WP:ATT. Please provide sources. kind regards and happy editing. --Merbabu 13:39, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Pee Wee Gaskins (band)"

A page you created, Pee Wee Gaskins (band), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Tombomp (talk) 14:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Do not use all capitals in reference citations - please try to use lower case as well -and the other thing - this is WIkipedia EN inggeris - the usage of Indonesian language references is not really appropriate - it would be like going onto Wikipedia IN and using english ciatations - Satu Suro 15:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contoh - Muljana, Prof. Dr. Slamet (2005). RUNTUHNYA KERAJAAN HINDU-JAWA DAN TIMBULNYA NEGARA-NEGARA ISLAM DI NUSANTARA. Yogyakarta: LKiS, p. 86-101..

There is no need to have it in capitals
It is unlikely that a normal user of Wikipedia EN is able to either access or read this as a reference, if you only know of Indonesian language references - they would be more useful on WP IN - than WP EN Satu Suro 15:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

We do have rules about english on english wikipedia_ this is one of the templates: -

(1) I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. See Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines.

Hey you did the right thing - you left a message at my talk page - but you must sign.

(2) Ok - the photo is not parangtritis - and I am Australian - ok? tetapi saya tinggal di yogya banyak tahun lalu. ok? Satu Suro 15:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(3) (1) and (2) do not add up? - the big problem is that when we try to write articles in WP English about Indonesia - there are some times when we cannot find english sources. But - we must try to abide by the important principals of WP:RS, WP:V, WP:N - and in some case there will only be Indonesian references - probably what you need is to have a good read of the welcome material again - and ask questions of User Merbabu and myself when you dont fully understand - best of luck! Satu Suro 15:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chi Chern

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chi Chern, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://chan1.org/mastercc.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:40, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Chichern.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Chichern.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Johncrook.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Johncrook.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Johncrook2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Johncrook2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:09, 5 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:09, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DDMlotusbell.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:DDMlotusbell.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ww2censor (talk) 14:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Dharma Drum Mountain.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Dharma Drum Mountain.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.