User talk:Zabanshenas

Welcome!

Hello, Zabanshenas, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as زبان‌شناس, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pichpich (talk) 22:07, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of زبان‌شناس

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on زبان‌شناس requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pichpich (talk) 22:07, 5 November 2016 (UTC) The word "زبان‌شناس" is the Persian equivalent of "linguist". It is interesting to note that the word "linguist" has no entry in Wikipedia, while you have accepted the terms such as physician. When we type "linguist" it automatically refers to "linguistics". On the other hand, there are equivalents in in Wikipedia for "linguist" in Russian, Swedish and so on . So the entry "linguist" should be created as a entry, for the two reasons above.Zabanshenas (talk) 07:12, 6 November 2016 (UTC) As was previously said, the word "زبان‌شناس" is the Persian equivalent of "linguist". It is not a proper name. I believe that there is a disturbance in classification of entries in Wikipedia. Why you do not use the word "linguist" in wikipedia? The word "زبان‌شناس" is the Persian equivalent of "linguist". Zabanshenas (talk) 20:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Mashhad rug, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC) I added some information to "Mashhad carpet", not "Persian rug". It was drawn from[reply]

    1)   the French and Spanish version of the same article:
    "Les tapis de Mashhad sont classés en deux groupes : les Mashhad et les Mashhad turkbâf. Le turkbâf, comme son nom l'indique, est réalisé au nœud turc par des artisans émigrés de Tabriz à Mashhad au xixe siècle.

    2) the Persian version of the same article:
    "مطابق نوشته‌ها و مدارک موجود قدیمی ترین قالی موجود منسوب به این شهر متعلق به دوره شاه عباس صفوی است."

So the edition should not be removed.

Speedy deletion nomination of Manne (word)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manne (word) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KAP03 (talk) 16:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Pendeli (pendulum)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Pendeli (pendulum). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Pendulum. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Pendulum – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. agtx 20:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of snow-intentioned Finnish words for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of snow-intentioned Finnish words is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of snow-intentioned Finnish words until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KAP03 (talk) 02:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manne (word)

Hello Zabanshenas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Manne (word) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Finnish Kale. Generally, single words don't have their own articles since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a theasurus. Please try Wiktionary for that instead.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sjö (talk) 08:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Words

Hi. You appear to be creating articles which are just dictionary definitions of Finnish words. The problem with that is the English Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and it's certainly not a Finnish dictionary. Please have a read of WP:NOTDICT before you create any more articles. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is incorrect because all the titles I prepared as articles are the articles of Wikipedia and, as can be seen, I linked them to the Finnish version of the articles. Zabanshenas (talk) 11:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They are the titles of the Wikipedia encyclopedia. You must improve the articles, instead of removing them, because the Wikipedia may be questioned for such terms which have no articles in English. In some articles there are Swedish and German versions, but no article in English could be found. I hope this to be sufficient to your discussion. Zabanshenas (talk) 11:53, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat, please read WP:NOTDICT. We don't care what the rules are on other Wikipedias, but the English Wikipedia does not carry articles that are mere dictionary definitions, especially not of foreign words. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I personally prefer an encyclopedia with a brief description that guides the reader to another references in Internet rather than a series of articles without any English reference. I again repeat: improve the context instead of removing the article.Zabanshenas (talk) 13:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We seem to be talking at cross purposes here. I know Wikipedia rules like WP:NOTDICT can be confusing, so I'll try to explain the problem in a bit more detail.
You say "improve the context instead of removing the article", and that is very much part of what we do here. But when it comes to, say, Pendeli (pendulum), how would we do that?
If it's supposed to be an article about the concept of the periodic swinging devices themselves, then we already have that at Pendulum.
But if it is purely about the Finnish word, and is intended to explain its meaning, usage, etymology, etc, then no matter how well it was expanded it would still not be an acceptable article on the English Wikipedia - because it would still be a dictionary definition, and the English Wikipedia community has decided that the English Wikipedia should not host dictionary definitions.
Personally, I think that's sensible. For one thing, if I wanted to know what a word meant (in whatever language) I'd look it up in a dictionary, not in an encyclopedia. And secondly, how many billions of words are there in all the languages of the world? It would be madness to try to include an entry in the English Wikipedia for every one of them.
I can appreciate that you personally might prefer a different approach (and there are rules here that I would like to see changed too), but we have to stick to Wikipedia policy as it is currently formulated (or get it changed by discussion and consensus). Anyway, I hope that helps. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:22, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Zabanshenas, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Scientific misconduct have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Your addition to Ferdowsi University of Mashhad has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC) I checked the text and found that you removed the following section:[reply]

Interestingly, having higher number of students (26,000), Ferdowsi university of Mashhad produces 639 papers compared to Shiraz University (20,000 students[13] with 1099 papers) and Isfahan University of Technology (10000 students[14] with 924 papers) out of Tehran, as well as Sharif University of Technology (10,502 students[15] with 1816 papers), Shahid Beheshti University (17067 students[16] with papers), Tarbiat Modares University (7,970 students[17] with papers 1418), Amirkabir University of Technology (13593 students[18] with 1347 papers), and Iran University of Science and Technology (11957 students[19] with 1107 papers). University of Tehran (50448 students[20] with 2570 papers) possesses twice number of student and four times number of publications as compared as Ferdowsi university of Mashhad.[21]

As I have personally written the section you have removed, I am very interested in and persist to know please exactly determine the source you think the edition has been drawn. I am waiting your reply.

Please do not reinstate the removed content while it is contested - I have removed it again. Wait for Diannaa to respond here and until your disagreement is resolved. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zabanshenas. I removed the wrong material by mistake. What I intended to remove was the material added in this edit, which appears to be copied from http://fouman.com/Y/Farsi4-Higher%20education%20in%20Iran.htm or elsewhere. Sorry about the mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Soikko

Hello, Zabanshenas. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Soikko, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zabanshenas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]