User talk:Zenon66

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, your account has been blocked; you are welcome to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zenon66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

NO, YOU SHOULD GIVE ME A MORE ACCURATED REASON FOR THIS

Decline reason:

Stop yelling, then we'll talk. Closedmouth (talk) 13:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zenon66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You have closed my account without giving me any specific reason. Usually a guilty charge is followed by a specific reason, but I can't see anything about this here.

Decline reason:

See response to unblock request below. JohnCD (talk) 20:15, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please take a minute to read the information I left above on the 11th. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:44, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a side note, this user does have some unrelated contributions that are good. To me, this block seems a little bit harsh, but that's just my opinion and it's not strong enough to reverse the block. l'aquatique[talk] 21:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zenon66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well, maybe I can't understand how wiki discussions exactly works, but if the reason above is just

"[...]Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website[..]",

there's just a guilty charge but not a specific reason; If I'm group/website please tell me more about your doubt. First off, in which contribute I gave you this sensation of making my own business ?

Decline reason:

Wikipedia's username policy prohibits usernames which are those of groups or organizations, because accounts must be for individuals only, who are personally responsible for them. You have been posting links to http://zenon66.altervista.org/ which suggests a connection to that organization. Before requesting an unblock to change username, you should also read our policies on WP:Conflict of interest and WP:External links. JohnCD (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zenon66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

About group/organization, I'm not making any profit about this. Furthermore, it's a just direct link to a free

songmodule downloadable anywhere (such modarchive) and not the whole site.

About external links issue, I got the style from this wiki link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markus_Kaarlonen

Decline reason:

That does not address the issue which led to the block. Your user name gives the impression that the account represents a business, which is against Wikipedia policy, whether you are making any profit from or not. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:56, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, the link you added violates the policy on external links. As you continued to add it, it therefore met the definition of WP:SPAM. As what appears to be a business subdomain matches your Wikipedia userid, it was quite simple for someone to deduce that you were related to the business, and profit or not, that's not permitted. As such, you have been blocked for WP:PROMO and a violation of the username policy. Hopefully that makes sense. Now, please stop using the unblock template to have a discussion. You can either replace your unblock template above with one that meets the requirements, or it will be declined and your talkpage locked for abuse of the unblock process. Ensure that in the future you follow the above policies carefully. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:28, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of M.U.D.S. – Mean Ugly Dirty Sport for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M.U.D.S. – Mean Ugly Dirty Sport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M.U.D.S. – Mean Ugly Dirty Sport until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of HotShot (video game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HotShot (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HotShot (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 03:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]