User talk:Zolgoyo

Dobrujan Tatar

Hello. Could you please stop differentiating Dobrujan Tatar from Crimean Tatar? They're the same language. This is what the sources say. You've given lots of problems up until now and if this continues I will need to ask for administrative action. This despite the good article you've managed to write about the topic. Super Ψ Dro 12:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would actually to add Dobrujan Tatar to Turkic languages (Template, Article etc.), because it is in Kipchak-Nogai branch and not in Kipchak-Cuman. I will also add a note that it is a dialect. Zolgoyo (talk) 21:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Siberya (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siberya (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siberya (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 13:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Siberya (song). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. BangJan1999 19:08, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Zolgoyo. Thank you for your work on Dobrujan Tatar alphabets. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:55, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Zolgoyo, this is my final warning. I've explained to you countless times that you should not refer to Dobrujan Tatar as a language. There was a requested move, and referring to it as a language was formally rejected [1]. And now you created this [2]. You've made me invest lots of time trying to explain to you the procedures at Wikipedia and fixing the things you've been doing. If after countless explanations and formal procedures you still do not understand why you should not refer to Dobrujan Tatar as a language I will report you at WP:ANI over WP:DISRUPTIVE and WP:COMPETENCE issues. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 09:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dobrujan Tatar dialects

A tag has been placed on Category:Dobrujan Tatar dialects indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dobrujan Tatar grammar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dobrujan Tatar grammar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 08:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan arndt Hi, I was creating the page actually... I did add some sources. Zolgoyo (talk) 18:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dobrujan Tatar grammar (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Edward-Woodrow was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Dobrujan Tatar dialect. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dobrujan Tatar grammar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Edward-Woodrow • talk 17:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zolgoyo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Edward-Woodrow • talk 17:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Edward-Woodrow Is it possible, that I expand the article and try it again? Zolgoyo (talk) 14:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't so much a problem of the length than that the topic isn't notable enough to merit its own article. However, the content could be merged into Dobrujan Tatar dialect. You can absolutely add more sources and resubmit it, though. Edward-Woodrow • talk 15:06, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Edward-Woodrow I have merged it. Zolgoyo (talk) 17:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dobrujan Tatar dialect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Hi,

I noticed you wanted to delete one of your pages, User:Zolgoyo/Arabic_script_in_Europe. Just wanted to let you know that in the future you can use the template {{Db-u1}} if it's a page you made in userspace.

Have a nice day,

LOOKSQUARE (👤️·🗨️) talk 16:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help request for "1995 March Gagauzian referendum"

Dear Zolgoyo, I am writing an article about 1995 March Gagauzian referendum. On the aftermath section I used a Moldovan/Romanian article using Machine Translation. Could you please help on the section, if you know Moldovan/Romanian language? Thanks. Joseph (talk) 16:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joseph,

I do not have enough knowledge actually. But maybe Super Dromaeosaurus can help you? Zolgoyo (talk) 17:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Joseph (talk) 17:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Joseph#Gagauz referendum. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Old Crimean Tatar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Old Crimean Tatar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 23:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dobrujan Tatar alphabet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alif.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dobrujan Tatar has been nominated for deletion

Category:Dobrujan Tatar has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Super Ψ Dro 23:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Old Crimean Tatar

Hello, Zolgoyo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Old Crimean Tatar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dobruja Horde

The article Dobruja Horde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unverifiable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 17:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]