Wikipedia:Edit warring: Revision history

29 October 2010

• curprev 15:1915:19, 29 October 2010‎ Nucleophilic talk contribs‎ 16,611 bytes +257‎ →‎Administrator guidance: WP:admin "Administrators should not use their tools to advantage, or in a content dispute (or article) where they are a party...."

28 October 2010

• curprev 21:3021:30, 28 October 2010‎ SlimVirgin talk contribs‎ m 16,354 bytes 0‎ moved template
• curprev 21:3021:30, 28 October 2010‎ SlimVirgin talk contribs‎ m 16,354 bytes +1‎ fixed typo
• curprev 21:2921:29, 28 October 2010‎ SlimVirgin talk contribs‎ 16,353 bytes −1,872‎ some tightening; could use more
• curprev 19:2019:20, 28 October 2010‎ SlimVirgin talk contribs‎ m 18,225 bytes +1‎ fixed typo
• curprev 19:1319:13, 28 October 2010‎ SlimVirgin talk contribs‎ 18,224 bytes +72‎ + 24 hours added to nutshell
• curprev 19:1119:11, 28 October 2010‎ SlimVirgin talk contribs‎ 18,152 bytes +258‎ clarified

26 October 2010

• curprev 21:4521:45, 26 October 2010‎ Qwyrxian talk contribs‎ 17,894 bytes −240‎ Reverted to revision 392390417 by Qwyrxian; Very strongly disagree; see talk page. (TW)
• curprev 16:5016:50, 26 October 2010‎ Nucleophilic talk contribs‎ 18,134 bytes +62‎ →‎The three-revert rule: Reverts done with permission of other editors
• curprev 16:3516:35, 26 October 2010‎ Nucleophilic talk contribs‎ 18,072 bytes +83‎ →‎What edit warring is: Reverts done with the tacit permission of the other editors are not edit-warring. See discussion
• curprev 16:2616:26, 26 October 2010‎ Nucleophilic talk contribs‎ 17,989 bytes +95‎ →‎What edit warring is: Reverting your own edits ( even if it violates the three-revert rule ) is not edit warring.

23 October 2010

• curprev 11:5611:56, 23 October 2010‎ Qwyrxian talk contribs‎ 17,894 bytes −120‎ Undid revision 392382946 by Special Cases (talk) As a major policy page, I don't think a joke picture is appropriate here; please discuss on talk if you want to re-add
• curprev 10:4110:41, 23 October 2010‎ Special Cases talk contribs‎ 18,014 bytes +120‎ added image

22 October 2010

• curprev 10:1810:18, 22 October 2010‎ IZAK talk contribs‎ m 17,894 bytes +3‎ No edit summary
• curprev 10:1710:17, 22 October 2010‎ IZAK talk contribs‎ m 17,891 bytes +12‎ No edit summary

17 October 2010

• curprev 09:2609:26, 17 October 2010‎ Lotje talk contribs‎ 17,879 bytes +38‎ * Wikipedia:Cabals are evil+alpha order

4 October 2010

• curprev 17:3817:38, 4 October 2010‎ Vaultdoor talk contribs‎ m 17,841 bytes +1‎ →‎The three-revert rule: conditional phrase should begin sentence, not end it
• curprev 17:3317:33, 4 October 2010‎ Vaultdoor talk contribs‎ m 17,840 bytes +2‎ →‎The three-revert rule: comma
• curprev 17:3117:31, 4 October 2010‎ Vaultdoor talk contribs‎ 17,838 bytes +4‎ →‎The three-revert rule: emphasize "other"---reverting your own posts is not vandalism
• curprev 17:2717:27, 4 October 2010‎ Vaultdoor talk contribs‎ 17,834 bytes +8‎ →‎What edit warring is: syntax-- divide sentence for clarity

2 October 2010

• curprev 13:1213:12, 2 October 2010‎ Kotniski talk contribs‎ 17,826 bytes −9‎ I'm sure MOS doesn't tell us to do that
• curprev 12:3012:30, 2 October 2010‎ 2tuntony talk contribs‎ 17,835 bytes +9‎ →‎The three-revert rule: WP:MOS

9 September 2010

• curprev 14:2614:26, 9 September 2010‎ Tenebrae talk contribs‎ 17,826 bytes +7‎ →‎How experienced editors avoid being dragged into edit wars {{anchor|Avoiding three-revert rule violations}}: name was already in use
• curprev 14:2414:24, 9 September 2010‎ Tenebrae talk contribs‎ 17,819 bytes +22‎ →‎How experienced editors avoid being dragged into edit wars {{anchor|Avoiding three-revert rule violations}}: shortcut

1 September 2010

• curprev 03:0203:02, 1 September 2010‎ Train2104 talk contribs‎ 17,797 bytes +21‎ caption

28 August 2010

• curprev 03:2603:26, 28 August 2010‎ Heimstern talk contribs‎ 17,776 bytes +22‎ rv; that's exactly what was intended. It's saying you can be blocked for breaking 3RR, but also for edit warring that does not violate 3RR.
• curprev 03:2303:23, 28 August 2010‎ Bsherr talk contribs‎ 17,754 bytes −22‎ This language merely indicates that one can be blcoked for other things too. Not sure it was intended.

23 August 2010

• curprev 12:0912:09, 23 August 2010‎ Nyttend talk contribs‎ 17,776 bytes +6‎ →‎The three-revert rule: Clear copyright violations are illegal in Florida

6 August 2010

• curprev 23:3723:37, 6 August 2010‎ Triona talk contribs‎ 17,770 bytes +44‎ →‎See also: WP:BRD is relevant here as a see also, because it describes an application of WP:BOLD that may look like edit warring, but is actually a tool to build consensus and break page "freezes"

30 July 2010

• curprev 18:3418:34, 30 July 2010‎ Sandman888 talk contribs‎ 17,726 bytes +6‎ enhance visibility. feel free to rev.

29 July 2010

• curprev 02:5402:54, 29 July 2010‎ Dffgd talk contribs‎ 17,720 bytes −7‎ shortcut isn't to there, it's to #The three-revert rule

9 July 2010

• curprev 19:0419:04, 9 July 2010‎ MC10 talk contribs‎ 17,727 bytes −18‎ fix dashes

8 July 2010

• curprev 12:2312:23, 8 July 2010‎ Kotniski talk contribs‎ 17,745 bytes +84‎ →‎Other revert rules
• curprev 12:2012:20, 8 July 2010‎ Kotniski talk contribs‎ m 17,661 bytes −21‎ →‎See also
• curprev 12:1712:17, 8 July 2010‎ Kotniski talk contribs‎ 17,682 bytes +867‎ →‎The three-revert rule: something about 1RR and 0RR, so they're in policy (not only in an essay) for when they get imposed in rulings

5 July 2010

• curprev 22:0422:04, 5 July 2010‎ Akerans talk contribs‎ m 16,815 bytes +46‎ Fixed link (section rename some time ago, link never corrected)
• curprev 10:0410:04, 5 July 2010‎ Kotniski talk contribs‎ 16,769 bytes −72‎ hatnote not necessary now - have created edit war as an article
• curprev 08:2008:20, 5 July 2010‎ Sonia talk contribs‎ 16,841 bytes +72‎ +hatnote

27 June 2010

• curprev 03:2503:25, 27 June 2010‎ Anythingyouwant talk contribs‎ 16,769 bytes +173‎ →‎The three-revert rule: Per talk page.

15 June 2010

• curprev 08:3408:34, 15 June 2010‎ Kotniski talk contribs‎ 16,596 bytes −7‎ what "revert" means in this context is too complex to explain in full in the lead - I think we should give a taster and then refer people explicitly to the rule itself
• curprev 06:3206:32, 15 June 2010‎ Gurch talk contribs‎ 16,603 bytes −233‎ why is this thing repeatedly bloated to twice the size it needs to be

14 June 2010

• curprev 22:0422:04, 14 June 2010‎ DoRD talk contribs‎ 16,836 bytes +158‎ boldly clarifying "undoing" per recent http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=368053404#Concerns_about_User:CUNYTruther

12 June 2010

• curprev 03:2603:26, 12 June 2010‎ ThePCKid talk contribs‎ 16,678 bytes +7‎ Added shortcut that I found

6 June 2010

• curprev 01:3701:37, 6 June 2010‎ Everything Else Is Taken talk contribs‎ m 16,671 bytes +3‎ →‎What edit warring is: Inserted a missing "is"

31 May 2010

• curprev 10:3110:31, 31 May 2010‎ MER-C talk contribs‎ m 16,668 bytes 0‎ (edit summary removed)
• curprev 10:3010:30, 31 May 2010‎ JOptionPane talk contribs‎ m 16,668 bytes 0‎ (edit summary removed)

27 May 2010

• curprev 14:2514:25, 27 May 2010‎ Graham87 talk contribs‎ m 16,668 bytes −1‎ →‎What edit warring is: a/an

22 May 2010

• curprev 11:2811:28, 22 May 2010‎ Xeno talk contribs‎ m 16,669 bytes +16‎ →‎The three-revert rule: "the policy on"

1 May 2010

• curprev 14:4914:49, 1 May 2010‎ Kotniski talk contribs‎ 16,653 bytes +203‎ as described at talk, this seems to harm rather than improve the logic clarity
• curprev 11:5511:55, 1 May 2010‎ SlimVirgin talk contribs‎ m 16,450 bytes −2‎ rmvd brackets