Wikipedia:Featured article review/Rock Springs massacre/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: IvoShandor, Quadell, WikiProject Organized Labour, WikiProject China, WikiProject Death, WikiProject United States, 28 Nov
Review section
[edit]I am nominating this featured article for review because it cites sources that are not high-quality RS. There are plenty of secondary sources on this incident, we should not be citing breaking news from 1885. (t · c) buidhe 20:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no improvement (t · c) buidhe 02:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, zero progress. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section largely concern sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd hate for this to go to waste. I'll look into sourcing starting this weekend. MSG17 (talk) 02:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, maybe waste is not a good word, but the point is that it seems it can be saved but no one else is taking it up. MSG17 (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- All FARs are potentially saveable in my opinion, but this one will require more work to fix it up than some since a lot of the citations are not HQRS. (t · c) buidhe 21:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- True... Haven't been able to do much with sourcing right now, but I'll see what I can get up to this evening and this week. MSG17 (talk) 17:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- All FARs are potentially saveable in my opinion, but this one will require more work to fix it up than some since a lot of the citations are not HQRS. (t · c) buidhe 21:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, maybe waste is not a good word, but the point is that it seems it can be saved but no one else is taking it up. MSG17 (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no edits. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no edits so far (t · c) buidhe 19:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - sourcing issues remain. The only edits since November have been moving an image and changing the short description. Hog Farm Talk 19:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - would have to agree with the above commentators. I unfortunately don't have time to improve it, and there hasn't been much new scholarship since 2000 based on a cursory scan of Google Scholar and Google Books. A lot of the post 1970 sourcing in this article is what comes up in my searches. Sorry to disappoint. MSG17 (talk) 18:58, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist No major edits since November, concerns remain about updating sources. Z1720 (talk) 03:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.