Wikipedia:Good article nominations/guidelines: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 22:5722:57, 30 September 2010 Fetchcomms talk contribs 9,990 bytes −4‎ →How to review an article: rm spaces undo

curprev 14:3614:36, 26 September 2010 Andrew Gray talk contribs 9,994 bytes −1‎ →Good article nominations: "basic" -> "core"; "basic" implies a lower level of quality than is really apt undo

curprev 21:3221:32, 19 September 2010 Geometry guy talk contribs 9,989 bytes −4‎ →Nomination categories: Serial comma no longer in favour apparently :/ undo

curprev 22:5422:54, 18 September 2010 Geometry guy talk contribs 9,993 bytes +168‎ Copyedit and restore undo
curprev 18:0618:06, 18 September 2010 Harej talk contribs 9,825 bytes +643‎ changing guidelines to reflect new procedure undo

curprev 17:3317:33, 14 September 2010 Edge3 talk contribs 9,182 bytes +71‎ →How to nominate an article: per talk, add note on nominator attitude undo

curprev 22:3822:38, 13 September 2010 Ucucha talk contribs m 9,111 bytes +309‎ Reverted edits by Bouchermark654 (talk) to last version by The Thing That Should Not Be undo
curprev 22:2622:26, 13 September 2010 Bouchermark654 talk contribs 8,802 bytes −309‎ →On Hold undo

curprev 15:2715:27, 7 September 2010 The Thing That Should Not Be talk contribs m 9,111 bytes +111‎ Reverted edits by 201.230.146.234 (talk) to last revision by Geometry guy (HG (Custom)) undo
curprev 15:2615:26, 7 September 2010 201.230.146.234 talk 9,000 bytes −111‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 21:2021:20, 23 August 2010 Geometry guy talk contribs 9,111 bytes +58‎ →How to review an article: Add clause about nominators with current nominations under review undo

curprev 04:1504:15, 3 July 2010 Marcia Wright talk contribs 9,053 bytes −1‎ →How to nominate an article: changed "your article" to "the article"in 3rd graph We cannot nom "our" own articles for one and two, "your" sounds possessive. undo

curprev 04:2804:28, 23 June 2010 Philcha talk contribs 9,054 bytes +17‎ →How to nominate an article: link to NomsByTopic undo

curprev 00:1400:14, 3 June 2010 Gary talk contribs m 9,037 bytes −92‎ Reverted 2 edits by 75.66.226.8 identified as vandalism to last revision by Ucucha. undo

curprev 23:0523:05, 2 June 2010 75.66.226.8 talk 9,129 bytes +68‎ →Second opinion undo
curprev 23:0423:04, 2 June 2010 75.66.226.8 talk 9,061 bytes +24‎ →Good article nominations undo

curprev 18:2018:20, 31 May 2010 Ucucha talk contribs 9,037 bytes +69‎ →Pass: GA symbol undo

curprev 20:2220:22, 28 March 2010 MuZemike talk contribs 8,968 bytes +164‎ Adding Checklinks for users to check external links on GANs all at once. undo

curprev 16:3516:35, 22 March 2010 Cryptic C62 talk contribs 8,804 bytes 0‎ →Nomination categories: looks better this way undo

curprev 22:0222:02, 16 February 2010 Geometry guy talk contribs 8,804 bytes −5‎ It is not the point of this guideline to argue over how long it takes for a GAN nomination to be reviewed (typically or worst case): the point is to encourage new reviewers to contribute. Thanks undo
curprev 14:3214:32, 16 February 2010 Firsfron talk contribs 8,809 bytes +1‎ it doesn't say 'the average is several weeks', it says 'it may take', and it certainly may take months; this is not pessimism, it is fact undo
curprev 04:4204:42, 16 February 2010 Gary talk contribs 8,808 bytes −1‎ uh no, you are being way too pessimistic. more than half of the nominations are reviewed in under one month undo
curprev 03:2903:29, 16 February 2010 Firsfron talk contribs m 8,809 bytes +1‎ →How to nominate an article: weeks->months undo

curprev 19:1519:15, 19 January 2010 Gary talk contribs 8,808 bytes −227‎ Undid revision 338766471 by 80.254.146.20 (talk) undo
curprev 15:2615:26, 19 January 2010 80.254.146.20 talk 9,035 bytes +227‎ →Fail undo

curprev 23:0923:09, 15 January 2010 AniRaptor2001 talk contribs m 8,808 bytes +1‎ →How to nominate an article: correct misspelling undo

curprev 20:0720:07, 17 December 2009 Geometry guy talk contribs 8,807 bytes −1‎ Appreciate your frustration, but... undo
curprev 00:5200:52, 17 December 2009 Ytrottier talk contribs m 8,808 bytes +1‎ →How to nominate an article: process now takes months, not weeks undo

curprev 01:0401:04, 1 November 2009 Dispenser talk contribs 8,807 bytes −219‎ Moving template to base undo

curprev 14:1414:14, 31 October 2009 Donlammers talk contribs 9,026 bytes 0‎ →How to nominate an article: Swapped steps 2 and 3 because the reference to "that subsection" is ambiguous when there is intervening text about the nominated article. undo

curprev 17:4017:40, 25 October 2009 Harej talk contribs 9,026 bytes −164‎ removing obsolete step undo

curprev 21:3021:30, 4 October 2009 Harej talk contribs 9,190 bytes −383‎ 29 edit reversions later, this step has been made obsolete undo

curprev 23:4623:46, 3 October 2009 Geometry guy talk contribs 9,573 bytes 0‎ →How to review an article: Four tildes per GAN header and talk undo

curprev 22:0222:02, 29 September 2009 Harej talk contribs 9,573 bytes −54‎ some minor adjustments and changing around the text now that the process is in transition undo
curprev 03:4703:47, 29 September 2009 Edge3 talk contribs 9,627 bytes +69‎ →How to review an article: revise instructions per talk undo

curprev 22:4922:49, 28 September 2009 Edge3 talk contribs 9,558 bytes +78‎ →How to review an article: revise to reflect attempts at future automation undo

curprev 22:3022:30, 8 September 2009 Fvasconcellos talk contribs m 9,480 bytes +13‎ →Pass: + undo
curprev 22:2922:29, 8 September 2009 Fvasconcellos talk contribs 9,467 bytes +112‎ →Pass: amending undo

curprev 22:2122:21, 1 September 2009 Gurch talk contribs 9,355 bytes −66‎ make section links work without reloading the page. they won't work on this page itself, only when it's transcluded. but that doesn't matter. undo

curprev 21:0621:06, 23 August 2009 Geometry guy talk contribs 9,421 bytes +4‎ Rework to provide the encouragement suggested; longer is not stronger and "backlog" is a matter of opinion that should not have been part of the guidelines undo
curprev 16:4716:47, 23 August 2009 Reywas92 talk contribs 9,417 bytes +14‎ →How to nominate an article: reword to be stronger undo

curprev 20:3520:35, 28 July 2009 WhatamIdoing talk contribs 9,403 bytes +67‎ →Nomination categories: Making these links work on this page undo
curprev 18:3918:39, 28 July 2009 WhatamIdoing talk contribs 9,336 bytes +5‎ →How to nominate an article: Change "should read" strictly optional advice to "may want to read" undo

curprev 23:5123:51, 26 July 2009 Wizardman talk contribs m 9,331 bytes −17‎ →Good article nominations undo
curprev 23:5023:50, 26 July 2009 Wizardman talk contribs 9,348 bytes +54‎ →Good article nominations: add total number undo

30 September 2010

26 September 2010

22 September 2010

19 September 2010

18 September 2010

14 September 2010

13 September 2010

7 September 2010

23 August 2010

3 July 2010

23 June 2010

3 June 2010

2 June 2010

31 May 2010

28 March 2010

22 March 2010

16 February 2010

19 January 2010

15 January 2010

17 December 2009

1 November 2009

31 October 2009

25 October 2009

4 October 2009

3 October 2009

29 September 2009

28 September 2009

8 September 2009

1 September 2009

23 August 2009

28 July 2009

26 July 2009