Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 December 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 5

[edit]
Uploaded by Superscubasteve (notify | contribs). (Not an orphan) Media photo, does not qualify for fair use per WP:FAIR#Counterexamples #5 BigDT 01:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by A Pair of Shoes (notify | contribs). Orphan Nv8200p talk 03:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by PZFUN (notify | contribs). OR, AB Nv8200p talk 03:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by PZFUN (notify | contribs). OR, AB Nv8200p talk 03:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Casimiri (notify | contribs). Orphan Nv8200p talk 03:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Gildo4realdo (notify | contribs). Not used on any articles, unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not a free web host, absentee uploader. MER-C 06:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Gildo4realdo (notify | contribs). Not used on any articles, unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not a free web host, absentee uploader. MER-C 06:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Joeskopek (notify | contribs). Not used on any articles, Wikipedia is not a free web host, absentee uploader. MER-C 06:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by [[User talk:#Image:P Stump.jpg listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs). UE, has been vandalized multiple times, links to page that is not consistent w/picture—SkierRMH
Uploaded by Wonkajuju391 (notify | contribs). OR, UE. Used in speedy-deleted article.—Calton | Talk 07:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wonkajuju391 (notify | contribs). Used in speedy-deleted article.—Calton | Talk 07:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wonkajuju391 (notify | contribs). Used in speedy-deleted article.—Calton | Talk 07:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Bmtxlaw (notify | contribs). OR, UE. Used in speedy-deleted bio.—Calton | Talk 07:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Rajishairy (notify | contribs). Offensive Image, Unknown Copyright Status—Sukh17 08:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC).\[reply]
Please use {{subst:nld}} for these cases. MER-C 12:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Apas Chef (notify | contribs). OR, AB, Users only uploa Nv8200p talk 13:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Ballista (notify | contribs). Orphan Nv8200p talk 13:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Corvi (notify | contribs). OR, AB Nv8200p talk 13:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can we hang onto this (and Image:ApeCaveSlime.jpg) for a bit? I know it's been a long while since I've had time to do any work here, but I still want to overhaul the Ape Cave article, and it badly need interior images. I don't know much about image deletion policy, though, so if this is a problem, go ahead and delete it. Corvi 21:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Khadimnaby (notify | contribs). CV, liscense tag states that user created the work, however he states in summary that the image is "property of my friend." He has provided no proof as to permission to use the image. See WP:COPYREQ.—Strothra 14:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Should I provide email form him? what kind of "proof" I need to provide online? I vote No Khadimnaby 14:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An e-mail would be helpful. --Strothra 15:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me email address of wikipedia copy right verification department? Khadimnaby 13:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

permissions AT wikimedia DOT org (replacing "AT" with @ and "DOT" with . respectively). howcheng {chat} 22:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Assume good faith. The email was received at the permissions system and I am making note on the image. Thanks. Bastiqe demandez 15:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Harish89 (notify | contribs). It's a "joke" edit of the original- AshadeofgreyTalk 14:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Kanuckwoods (notify | contribs). Only used in Andrew pearsall, a speedily deleted article. - Mike Rosoft 15:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Goodparley (notify | contribs). Not used in any articles. Unencyclopedic. --Slowking Man 17:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Goodparley (notify | contribs). Not used in any articles. Unencyclopedic. Possible copyright violation. --Slowking Man 17:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Goodparley (notify | contribs). Not used in any articles. Unencyclopedic. --Slowking Man 17:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by The Anome (notify | contribs). orphaned image; outdated information Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 18:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Lightning (notify | contribs). orphaned image; absent uploader; outdated information Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 18:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by The Anome (notify | contribs). orpahned image; outdated information Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 18:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Brian.Burnell (notify | contribs). CV; taking a photo or scanning another work in this fashion doesn't give you ownership. — Rebelguys2 talk 19:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

This and the picture below are fotos of the article Brian wrote in a local article, so this basically shows the Wikipedians what he does. I'd say it's POV, and "CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat|it is attributed to Brian Burnell as the photographer." makes no good impression. --FlammingoParliament 17:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that is borders on the intent portions of copyright usage. Appears that the author of the work is trying to "get around" the copyright. -Visorstuff 18:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just an aside - perhaps he would license it under cc-by since that is what he seems to be doing - "The copyright holder allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that Brin Burnell is attributed as the author and photographer." Allowing any use (a license) for any purpose (no nc or other caveats) provided that Brian is attributed (require attribution). This is really no different that a cc-by license, 'unless he expects attribution on each page on which it is used. Which is different, and if so should be removed. --Trödel 19:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Brian.Burnell (notify | contribs). CV; taking a photo or scanning another work in this fashion doesn't give you ownership. — Rebelguys2 talk 19:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Matthew Amroliwala article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 18:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Chris Eakin article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 18:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Jon Sopel (journalist) article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 18:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Gavin Hewitt article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 18:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Fred Dinenage article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Louise Minchin article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Helen Willetts article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Jane Hill article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Denis Murray article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Ellie Crisell article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Simon McCoy article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Sangita Myska article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Pallab Ghosh article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the John Kettley article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Matthew Price article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Anita McNaught article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Lowri Turner article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Fergal Keane article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 19:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Stephen Cole article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by GMc (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Felicity Barr article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Lyse Doucet article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Natasha Kaplinsky article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Mark Mardell article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Andrew Harvey (journalist) article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Mitchazenia (notify | contribs). Orphaned, obsoleted by Image:Erika 2003 track.pngHurricanehink (talk) 20:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Peter Levy article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Jon Snow article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the BBC Look North (Yorkshire and North Midlands) article by showing what the presenter looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Peter Horrocks article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiman wonder (notify | contribs). orphaned, sole contribution of editor, unencylopedic Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Adrian Chiles article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Kirsty Wark article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Kate Silverton article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Martine Croxall article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Rageh Omaar article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Manisha Tank article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Martine Dennis article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by SOy OSKuRiToHeh (notify | contribs). Wikipedia is not your webhost album—-- Drini 20:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the David Jessel article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Mark Easton article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Abagofajay (notify | contribs). orphaned image, unencyclopedic, conflicting copyright claims "The image was found at http://www.retrogamezone.com/babes/bush01.jpg. I made it, and it is public domain." Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Tomasz Schafernaker article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by REHaverfield (notify | contribs). orpahned, sole contribution of editor, no specific source mentioned (only google.com) and text added at upload seems to contradict the PD license applied. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Carrie Gracie article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Matt Barbet article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by TVXPert (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Daljit Dhaliwal article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by JFLANNES (notify | contribs). orphaned, sole contribution of editor, unencylopedic Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Guto Harri article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 20:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Clarence Mitchell article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Vinceworld749 (notify | contribs). orpahned, sole contribution of editor, unencyclopedic Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 21:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Claire Balding article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the UK Today article by showing what one of the presenters looked like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Moira Stuart article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Rory Cellan-Jones article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Matt Frei article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Ben Brown (journalist) article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Brian Hanrahan article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Robert Peston article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Jeremy Bowen article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Hazel Irvine article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Paddy O'Connell article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Andrew Marr article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The fair use claim (Wikipedia boilerplate) says "for identification and critical commentary on the station ID or program and its contents". Well, this image certainly does identify the program's contents, i.e. the subject of the article, Andrew Marr. This is one that should be retained until a better (clearer) image comes along. A better case can be made for deleting other images. Hu 10:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Andrew Neil article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the BBC Points West article by showing what one of the main presenters looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the BBC London article by showing what one of the main presenters looks like and the Riz Lateef article for the same reason.- Wikiwoohoo 21:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Gordon Burns (television) article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Gavin Esler article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Derek Brockway article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Kaddy Lee-Preston article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Alina Jenkins article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Daniel Corbett article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Daniel Corbett article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the David Dimbleby article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Colin Pillinger article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Nik Gowing article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 21:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Carol Kirkwood article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 22:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Akhtar Khan article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 22:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Tim Willcox article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 22:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the David Eades article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 22:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). No longer required in the Tim Willcox article. Would also fail the fair use claim if kept as with other images.- Wikiwoohoo 22:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Tom Brook article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 22:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Duke53 (notify | contribs). Copyright violation: The uploader grayed out the copyrighted portion that states "©2003 IRI" makes it seems that the owner of the image knows that the image is in violation of the copyright, and knowingly removed the copyright notice (ie, the author had the intent to remove copyright notice to break copyright laws). I think an image of this kind has merit on Wikipedia, but needs to be replaced with one that includes the copyright notice to use under fair use (ie "intent" portions of copyright law). The church has sued and been very proactive about protecting their copyrighted materials [1]. Suggest re-uploading image under fair use. —Visorstuff 22:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and re-upload modified version. I don't think it's necessarily a copyright violation as-is, but it should be modified to more clearly support grounds for fair use. It should include the copyright notice. I don't think it necessarily has to be redacted, but it should not be of such high quality that one could use it in a forgery, but maybe just good enough quality for commentary purposes. See, for example, this page from an Ex-Mormon site which doesn't appear to have been sued by the church yet (although it's pretty dicey since the author seems to be promoting temple recommend fraud). Maybe, for extra caution, somebody could put some red lettering over the top such as "NOT VALID", or fill in the form with "John Doe" information. Having it black-and-white instead of the original yellow is a good thing, from a strictly legal point of view. COGDEN 00:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per COGDEN's comments. Well said. alanyst /talk/ 23:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per COGDEN's and Visorstuff's comments. Re-upload as fair use image as they have described. --FyzixFighter 00:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per COGDEN - reupload seems best --Trödel 05:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, but strongly encouraged to improve the redacting effort and put the impage back in. Storm Rider (talk) 19:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Protect The image is not a copyright violation, it meets the requirements for 'fair use'. Most importantly the image is not used for profit by the LDS, its also not a work that its author is claiming recognition for. Concerns about the document being used for fraud are not at issue for copyright violations. Also readacting portions of the original if anything strengthen a fair use argument because less of the original is being used. Sqrjn 02:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Whether the image is used for profit is immaterial; copyright law is concerned with whether the value of the material is materially diminished. In this case, the value of the temple recommend is the certification it provides for the bearer. If the image makes it straightforward to create forged recommends, the value of the document is diminished because the certification becomes much less reliable. Such a scenario is not likely to be protected under fair use. Also, you are incorrect about the author not claiming recognition for it; if that were so, the (unredacted) recommend would not have the copyright notice on it. If fair use can be applied to this image, it would in my opinion have to be because the loss of color and the redactions make it difficult to use it for forgery. In the age of Photoshop, I'm not sure whether these changes are sufficient, but perhaps they are. But it would be better to have an image that is less borderline than this one AND contains the copyright notice, so that a clear fair use rationale can be provided and it doesn't appear that someone's trying to evade the copyright. alanyst /talk/ 17:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the John Simpson article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 22:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Jennie Bond article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 22:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Julia George article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 22:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Lupin (notify | contribs). Now on CommonsDysmorodrepanis 22:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Sky News article by showing what one of the presenters look like, while the same can be said for the image's inclusion in the James Rubin and World News Tonight (UK TV series).- Wikiwoohoo 22:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Peter Dobbie article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 22:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Incorrect fair use claim since the image illustrates the Aaron Heslehurst article by showing what the subject looks like.- Wikiwoohoo 22:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]