Possibly improperly. The image may have protections, as detailed at Template:Statue. I've asked Raul654 for clarification. --Durin 15:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Raul indicated on his talk page that since the statue was commissioned by federal US government, it is free of copyrights from that source. --Durin 20:42, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I listed the name of the author, the source and date it was created. Also an image of her is needed for her article. This image does meet the fair use criteria. - [rts_freak]
Keep this image Rts freak has written the copyright holder, source, date and author and has written a fair use rationale. Abu sometimes over-reacts about fair use images. If you could easily take a picture of Allison Mack, then do it and upload it, but this fair use image should stay until that happens. - Ivan Kricancic 04:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The problem I have is where the image came from. Wireimage.com's business is to license images for print, web, and broadcast use so to use their image could impact it's commercial value. -Nv8200ptalk 18:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I really dont think using this image will impact it's commercial value. - [rts_freak]
Don't delete this image, at least not yet; I emailed WireImage about using this image and releasing it under the GFDL or whatever, and I'm just waiting for their response. Thank you. - KingIvan 07:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Route 82 (notify | contribs). Bad fair use criteria. Maps are used under fair use to illustrate a road, not the mapping technology itself (which would be about the only reason a map would fall under fair use. —Scott5114↗ 04:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Route 82 (notify | contribs). Bad fair use criteria. Maps are used under fair use to illustrate a road, not the mapping technology itself (which would be about the only reason a map would fall under fair use. —Scott5114↗ 04:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Frogsprog (notify | contribs). AB, probable CV. Uploader has been indefinitely blocked from Wikipedia for trolling and vandalism [1]; this image is only used on one page where the bannee was most active. I have been unable to find any proof that the copyright holder has actually waived his/her rights as claimed by the tag. Aaron 15:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Boobiegirl (notify | contribs). OR, AB, probably wrong license tag since source states "All Rights Reserved" Fritz S. (Talk) 17:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Shuppiluliuma (notify | contribs). Image a replica of imagevio. Uploaded under fair use however this makes 4 fair use images for one article. Claiming fair use just to show different markings is a very weak rationale. Mark83 17:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Shuppiluliuma (notify | contribs). Image a replica of imagevio. Uploaded under fair use however this makes 4 fair use images for one article. Claiming fair use just to show different markings is a very weak rationale. Mark83 17:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. The only place this could have been used as a fair use image is in an article about the airplane itself. howcheng {chat} 18:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I would have thought, or at least only delete if someone has already converted it to SVG (assuming that's as good and also allows future editing). -- Solipsist 19:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's an orphan. Why convert it? -Nv8200ptalk 21:59, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
AFIK this is only an orphan because it is a zipped source file used for making Image:Madrid-metro-map.png (as it says on the image description page). The png version is a Feature Picture and far from orphaned. I can see the desire for removing all zip files, but only if we have an equally good source file in svg or some other format that can be used for future updates. -- Solipsist 21:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, go ahead and delete this one. It is not the current version of the metro map in any case. At some point I'll put up a vector version of the current one. - Montréalais 16:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Smartsmith (notify | contribs). LQ, License restriction "Users can save a soft copy on their computers, but please inform me if you want to make a hard copy" is incompatible with Wikipedia image policy. Nv8200ptalk 20:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Regardless of the quality of the proposed replacement, this image violates WP:FUC #1 -- he is a living person and a free alternative could be created. howcheng {chat} 18:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
07:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
