Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 July 9
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 July 9)
July 9
[edit]- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic graphic for user page of a retired editor BigrTex 00:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Rathfelder (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Alister crowley (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 00:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- MakeRocketGoNow (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Non-free book cover being use to illustrate an article on the author. Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- I went ahead and removed it from the article and deleted it. Obvious FU violation. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- TheJungleShark (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, likely Unencyclopedic BigrTex 00:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- RobertHansen (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- RobertHansen (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, Users only upload Nv8200p talk 01:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, likely Unencyclopedic BigrTex 01:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Javallance (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- OE, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Annihi later (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Unencyclopedic stick drawing BigrTex 01:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned website logo, Absent uploader (only contribution) BigrTex 01:20, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Real tymer (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Unencyclopedic - uploaded for Lucas Perry (speedied under A7) BigrTex 01:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- King_Chavez (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, no context to determine encyclopedic value BigrTex 01:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Teemu Ruskeepää (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned personal photo BigrTex 01:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Artificial msis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Low quality, Absent uploader , Legal threat in summary Nv8200p talk 02:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Christopher Scum (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- NightBlade234 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Bijanzamani (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 02:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, probably unneeded. If we should ever need an image like this, we can probably just use Image:Star of David.svg and Image:Christian cross trans.svg; there seems to be no reason to keep this low-resolution image. —Bkell (talk) 03:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Note: I notified the uploader; subsequently the uploader removed the notice [1]. —Bkell (talk) 04:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Fluffyducky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic — Nicwright 04:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC).
- Fluffyducky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic — Nicwright 04:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC).
- Fluffyducky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic — Nicwright 04:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC).
- Fluffyducky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic — Nicwright 04:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC).
- Fluffyducky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic — Nicwright 04:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC).
- Fluffyducky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic — Nicwright 04:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC).
- Fluffyducky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic — Nicwright 04:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC).
- Fluffyducky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic — Nicwright 04:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC).
- Fluffyducky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic — Nicwright 04:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC).
- Fluffyducky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic — Nicwright 04:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC).
- Keshiheads01 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, probably unencyclopedic, uploader claims PD-self but is most certainly not the original creator. —Bkell (talk) 06:34, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keshiheads01 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Used only in KHE, which has been listed for deletion; probably unencyclopedic if KHE is deleted. Also the uploader claims PD-self but gives a URL as the source. —Bkell (talk) 06:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- believe it or not, there is no evidence this was an insurgent video, it was first released by the associated press not through terrorist outlets, every website with this photo says copyright of AP Bleh999 09:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- The image is copyright of Khalid Mohammed/AP[2], it is a work for hire for AP, the camera man was not an insurgent. The current rationale is bogus No loss of commercial viability, freely distributed to media outlets for maximum exposure by the original cameraman Khalid Mohammed has taken numerous images for AP and appears to be a press employee, no one can release a copyrighted image or video into the public domain, maybe this image could be used as fair use in an article that directly discusses the image itself, but right now it's being used in 7 articles, that is not a legitimate use of fair use unfortunately. Bleh999 09:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- OR and OB - Image has been replaced by more suitable cropped and zoomed version - Image:Astute1cropped.jpg. — John Smith's 10:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak oppose deletion on attribution history grounds, even though PD doesn't require this. Also the user has not linked to the supposed better version of this image. -N 17:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- What are you talking about. I have listed the better version already. John Smith's 20:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think you should have just uploaded over the old version. howcheng {chat} 20:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how to do that, you see. John Smith's 16:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think you should have just uploaded over the old version. howcheng {chat} 20:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- What are you talking about. I have listed the better version already. John Smith's 20:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- OR and OB - Image has been replaced by more suitable cropped and zoomed version - Image:Astute2cropped.jpg. — John Smith's 10:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak oppose deletion on attribution history grounds, even though PD doesn't require this. Also the user has not linked to the supposed better version of this image. -N 17:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- What are you talking about. I have listed the better version already. John Smith's 20:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- OR and OB - Image has been replaced by two cropped versions that are more appropriate for use - Image:Geisha Kyoto Gion.jpg and Image:Kyoto geisha.jpg. — John Smith's 10:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Now on commons. However I would like to note that we can never discard the original version of an image that has been cropped, especially one with a GFDL license such as this one. To do so would violate the GFDL. -N 17:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- This one is a slightly different case. Image:Geisha Kyoto Gion.jpg was uploaded originally by User:ToddLara (see log) and moved to Commons via the {{NowCommons}} process, so while Image:Geisha kyoto.jpg might be a larger/uncropped version, the modifications were done by the original photographer, so it's no big deal to delete this one. howcheng {chat} 22:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- album cover, used only in article on band, no mention of cover art – Quadell (talk) (random) 11:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- album cover, used only in article on band, no mention of cover art – Quadell (talk) (random) 11:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- album cover, used only in article on band, no mention of cover art – Quadell (talk) (random) 11:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- album cover, used only in article on band, no mention of cover art – Quadell (talk) (random) 11:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- BaylorPinoy (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is a cast photo for a TV show. I don't think it shows anything that free photos of the actors would not. – Quadell (talk) (random) 11:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Jonyandrhe (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is also a cast photo for a TV show. Although the characters are in police uniforms, I question whether this image shows anything that free images of actors would not. Thoughts? – Quadell (talk) (random) 11:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- If you view it as an ensemble of characters, rather than actors, it seems like a straightforward fairuse claim (although *some* might argue screenshots impinge less on commercial value). In more extreme cases, it's obvious that free image of actors cannot replace images of characters - this image cannot hope to replace this image, and even this image cannot hope to replace this image. How far does this principle extend? It's not clear. Full uniforms + (little) makeup? A free photo of the actors probably wouldn't convey the same impression. WilyD 14:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete because if it's really from FOX.com (no link provided) it's not promotional at all. FOX.com's images are produced to enhance their site, not ours. Their terms of use make it perfectly clear that we are not welcome to reuse the material as "promotional". --Abu badali (talk) 15:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oldcritter (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image is being used to illustrate the article about the person depicted on the cover. The cover does not contain any critical commentary about the film or the DVD cover, and it does not significantly increase the reader's understanding of the subject per WP:NFCC#8. Videmus Omnia 12:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weierstraß (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Non-free film screenshot which doesn't show anything more than what's already in the text, thus failing WP:NFCC #8. howcheng {chat} 17:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- there is no need a for a low quality non free image of a living subject to illustrate the article, besides the fair use rationale is incorrect since it mentions a 'non profit educational' clause of the fair use law, that can't be used since it violates wikipedia policy on non commerical restrictions Bleh999 17:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, there is a need for a fair use image, since it's going to be difficult to find a public domain "mugshot", and this clearly satisfies every aspect of FU, even if the "educational" part was misguided. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 20:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- He is still alive and has been photographed by the media in interviews since being released, why does it need to be a mugshot for his biography? Bleh999 21:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- First of all, because that is the person who was arrested - he was a kid, not a middle-aged man at the time. Secondly, because it is a far lesser trespass on intellectual rights to use a police photograph, than a media photograph. Your best bet though, if you want a "friendly" image, is to find a way to contact his family (his mother used to be quite prolific and media-friendly) and ask for the release of a personal photograph. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 05:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- He is still alive and has been photographed by the media in interviews since being released, why does it need to be a mugshot for his biography? Bleh999 21:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Againstyou135 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic. Videmus Omnia 17:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Prebatechart.jpg - obsoleted by FTRebate.png — Morphh (talk) 17:54, 09 July 2007 (UTC).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader (only remaining contribution), Low quality, no context to determine encyclopedic value BigrTex 18:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Perez julien (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned logo of an opensource project, Absent uploader (only contribution) BigrTex 18:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned banner, Absent uploader (only contribution), compilation likely contains copyrighted elements BigrTex 18:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Obsolete (Image:KingShaka.jpg) BigrTex 18:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Formerly used in now-deleted article "Ian Linnegan" (see log). It is my opinion that no there is no further use for this image, now that the article is deleted. Iamunknown 18:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Tagged as PD-self, but description implies it's a screencap from a copyrighted dvd Abu badali (talk) 18:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- no evidence of cc-by release Abu badali (talk) 18:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Tagged as self-gfdl and self-cc-by-sa, but description implies it's a screencap from a copyrighted dvd Abu badali (talk) 18:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Clear copyvio. Uploader specifies that the picture was taken from a TV screenshot of the Old Grey Whistle Test. Uploader does not own the rights to this. — The Parsnip! 19:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree screenshot showing a musician holding a microphone. It doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information that can't be conveyed with text. Abu badali (talk) 19:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Daddy_Kindsoul (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Flickr image is said to be CC-BY, but it's unlikely to be accurate, since it's an album cover Abu badali (talk) 19:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary non-notable unfreee screenshot showing a musician an an instrument doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text. Abu badali (talk) 20:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary non-free mugshot aparently used solely to illustrate the information that the person in question was "mug-shotted". It doens't seem to add any noteworthy information that can't be conveyed with free material. Abu badali (talk) 20:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Certainly the image was iconic, and was commented on specifically (more than just the fact of his pro-forma arrest). The article doesn't go into that, though, unfortunately. It should. When the article is expanded to document the reaction this particular photo caused, the image should be re-uploaded, I think. – Quadell (talk) (random) 01:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- João_Felipe_C.S (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessarry screenshot used in a gallery Abu badali (talk) 20:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- João_Felipe_C.S (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary screenshot Abu badali (talk) 20:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- João_Felipe_C.S (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary screenshot Abu badali (talk) 20:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- João_Felipe_C.S (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-free screenshot Abu badali (talk) 20:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- João_Felipe_C.S (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-free screenshot Abu badali (talk) 20:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- João_Felipe_C.S (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-free screeenshot Abu badali (talk) 20:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- João_Felipe_C.S (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-free screenshot used in a gallery, doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information Abu badali (talk) 20:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Possible WP:BLP implications. Mugshot used in Murder of Nathalie Mahy and Stacy Lemmens to depict suspect never indicted or tried for crime. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 21:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- nbc.com is not a source for promotional material. Their images are produced to enhance their site (and those of their partners), not ours. Abu badali (talk) 21:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- This issue was already discussed before refer to the link below BCV 04:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- IFD discussion
- Keep Verifiable source defining it as a promotional image. Given the fact The West Wing is out of production and not aired on NBC should answer the exclusivity of this picture.BCV 04:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- What source, may I ask, defines it as a "promotional image"? --Iamunknown 06:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I was mistaken the first time around for Allison Janney as my understanding of image policies and their enforcement has become more nuanced over the past year. Recommend replacement with a still frame from an episode, although personally this character article is too in-universe and rather crufty for my tastes. howcheng {chat} 19:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I don't know that I would call the decision a year ago wrong - it was consistent with the way we did things at the time. We no longer take an attitude of "if it's on their website, it must be promotional" - we would only use this photo if it were verifiably a part of a press kit. --BigΔT 02:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sartoris42 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned (appears to have never been used), Obsolete - Image:ILMap-doton-Kewanee.PNG is in use on Kewanee, Illinois, and I believe that it is more accurate based on my assessment of the county map found here. BigrTex 22:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, probably an unencyclopedic personal photo. —Bkell (talk) 23:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)