Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 April 28
April 28
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
This template is covered by alternate template Template:WestfieldAustralia and it does not link to any other article, in addition all links on the template link back to the same place. 79.67.123.94 (talk) 22:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
No longer used, replaced by alternate template. Requested by template author.. Tiggerjay (talk) 20:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Since you're the author, you can request for speedy deletion by placing
{{Db-g7}}on the template page. eDenE 21:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
National team templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC) It's been awhile since I've been here, but a couple of the team templates in discussions below reminded me to check on how many new templates have popped up, that violate the WP:FOOTY project's consensus against team templates for all but world cup participants. That consensus holds for the confederations top-level tournaments, such as the Euro, and Asia Cup. Suprisingly, I could only find three new templates; which either means that I've missed some discussions in the past few months, or that the project has successfully throttled most of the unnecessary template creation. Anyway, without further ado:
- Template:Iran Squad 1976 AFC Asian Cup (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Iran Squad 1968 AFC Asian Cup (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Iran Squad 1972 AFC Asian Cup (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Links to all the previous discussions that I'm aware of can be found here.
- Delete all per project consensus and prior discussions. Neier (talk) 14:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. GiantSnowman 14:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete all per everything. Punkmorten (talk) 19:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
A navigational template... for disambiguation pages and redirects. What's the point? — NE2 02:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Convert to category. A category would better serve the purpose. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Everything's already in Category:Pre-1970 state highways in Washington. --NE2 03:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete It was my accident. I will fix it. — ComputerGuy890100Talk to meWhat I've done to help Wikipedia 22:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. It should be removed from the disambiguation pages it's currently on. Beyond that, the only pages it would belong on already have {{WA PSH}} serving the same purpose. (Also, per above, it might now be speedyible under {{db-author}}.) -- Kéiryn talk 23:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic and used only for a talk page post at Talk:Jandarma İstihbarat ve Terörle Mücadele . Not really a template except by namespace, but rather an editorial remark. Given the history of usage stretches back to 2004 and the template shows a 2006 creation, it might be a recreation of a previously deleted template. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jandarma Istihbarat ve Terorle Mucadete may also be relevant to its origin. Suggest Delete, possibly with replacement of text, if feasible and desirable. — Michael Devore (talk) 01:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. This appears to be someone's recommendation from a long-ago Votes for deletion (now Articles for deletion) discussion, but due to the discrepancy between the edit history and the usage history, I don't know if we can tell whose recommendation it represents. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.