Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 December 20

< December 19	December 21 >

December 20

Template:Garfield and Friends Season 7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Garfield and Friends Season 7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All content was deleted or redirected. Not transcluded anywhere. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 21:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's highly doubtful that any of these episodes will ever be notable enough to warrant their own article, and therefore that makes this template obsolete. Bettia (rawr!) 11:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Garfield and Friends Season 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:12, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Garfield and Friends Season 3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All content was deleted or redirected. Not transcluded anywhere. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 21:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's highly doubtful that any of these episodes will ever be notable enough to warrant their own article, and therefore that makes this template obsolete. Bettia (rawr!) 11:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - vanity template. Not helpful for creating an encyclopedia, useful in an advertisement service. --Pan Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 16:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Satovcha Municipality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Satovcha Municipality (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Declined speedy deletion. Original speedy nominator's rationale was, "it is replaced by Template:Satovcha". SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:36, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not sure why this doesn't qualify as CSD T3. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 19:49, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. If it is a less useful version of another template, it qualifies for CSD:T3 (as Rambo's Revenge has already stated). This is definitely the least useful of the two templates (although the other Satovcha template is still incomplete) and also has the added bonus of a removed non-free image. Bettia (rawr!) 12:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bruce Campbell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bruce Campbell (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I don't think filmography templates are allowed. 04:21, 7 December 2008 (UTC) —Precedingunsigned comment added by Beast from da East (talk• contribs)

Speedy Keep - Category:American film director templates, for example, disagrees with you. //roux 15:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- True, but this template contains all of Campbell's acting roles in addition the two films he directed. If the template is kept, it may need to be cut down to just the two directing entries. --Metropolitan90 (talk)02:16, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have no problem with the films he directed but this template is for the films he appeared in, more accomplised actors don't have this type of template because it is not allowed, if this was allowed every actor from Bruce Willis to Bruce Lee would have a template, even Campbell's cameos where he had less then 5 minutes of screen time are included, we do not need this template. Beast from da East (talk) 21:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm inclined to agree that this is not useful as a navigational template, as most of these films have nothing in common but a Bruce Campbell cameo. If kept, it should be cut down to just the films he directed or those in which he played a significant role.Terraxos (talk) 17:06, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting. Never properly tagged until now. --User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 12:31, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Terraxos, not useful as a navigational template, precedent is that filmography templates generally shouldn't exist. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Concensus is firmly against such actor filmography templates, and stripping it down to his two directorial credits makes this pretty much useless. PC78 (talk) 12:57, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete consensus has been against. Besides, such a template is useless. --Pan Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 16:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Award

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:31, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Award (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, unused template. Also may cause possible confusion with the useful Template:Infobox award. The user who created it has never edited in the article mainspace, so I cannot imagine ~~this has or~~ will ever be used. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 12:28, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Actually this was probabaly used in the deleted and salted Chip Shop Awards page. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 12:35, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and move {{Infobox award}} to {{Infobox Award}}, per naming conventions at MOS:INFOBOX. PC78 (talk) 19:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Bruckner Symphony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Template is not redundant, as claimed, at this time. JPG-GR (talk) 23:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Bruckner Symphony (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox Musical Composition}}. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 03:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Has numerous fields not covered by {{Infobox Musical Composition}}. In particular the different editions of Bruckner symphonies have an importance usually absent in other works. Grover cleveland (talk) 04:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- conversion to the targetwould result in a loss of data. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redundant. --Pan Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 16:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Symphony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Template is not redundant, as claimed, at this time. JPG-GR (talk) 23:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Symphony (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox Musical Composition}}. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 03:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose key, movements, and opus do not appear in the target. It would be necessary to add further elements to the target before conversion to it was feasible. However we might convert this to a Classical Music Infobox, which woulsd also cover other types of classical composition such as Concerto, sonata, and opera. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Singles discography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted by User:Nick. JPG-GR (talk) 23:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Singles discography (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in Marillion discography (Fish era), where it should be replaced with a standard discography instead. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 03:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cherry-picking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cherry-picking (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

While this template is well-meaning, it seems to be just a particular instance of {{POV}}; I'm not sure what will be gained by having this on an article instead of, or in addition to, the POV tag. Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 01:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got carried away with other stuff and will be soon working on writing essay on the application of this template. The template helps classify a particular error/fallacy which may lead to unwarranted content forking and I request not deleting it. --RoadAhead ^=Discuss= 01:29, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Too specific to be useful. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - since it is used a couple of articles, I would suggest keep, even though it is very specific. -- IRP ☎ 19:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete too specific. If an article has just cherry-picking problem, it's easier to fix it than to seek a specific template. --Pan Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 16:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete sites a controverial essay as if was policy. travb (talk) 19:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unhelpful. Deb (talk) 23:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Melissa Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:35, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Melissa Smith (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As it currently links to only two articles (the main article and one single), it is clearly premature and unnecessary, and there is already sufficient linking between the two articles. Mr. Absurd (talk) 01:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Way too few links. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vanity template.--Pan Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 16:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - completely inappropriate. Deb (talk) 23:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Malcolm in the Middle Series 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 23:18, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Malcolm in the Middle Series 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is unused and unnecessary. TTN (talk) 01:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete broken and useless. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.