Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 November 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 22[edit]

Template:George Clooney sidebar[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:George Clooney sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template with only three links, unneeded redundancy as they all appear on his main article. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:40, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When I was fixing the image I was thinking it was a rather useless template. Too bad, because the image fix was a nice improvement. Oh well. – JBarta (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per precedent set by similar sidebar TfDs —PC-XT+ 08:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DC Comics' shared universe films[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:53, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Andaz Liverpool Street[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Andaz Liverpool Street (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; contains only a <templatedata> element. Reticulated Spline (tc) 13:20, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would speedy delete it as a test, especially since it hasn't been touched in months —PC-XT+ 08:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; I'll let it sit out there for another few hours. Bearian (talk) 01:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BeginnerQuestion and Template:AdvancedQuestion[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BeginnerQuestion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:AdvancedQuestion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; seemingly created for use at the Teahouse wishing well, but the sole reference to them was removed by their creator moments after they added it. Reticulated Spline (tc) 12:58, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Top 30 Chinese High Schools[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Top 30 Chinese High Schools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This ranking was created by an non-notable organization, and has nothing to do with the University of Maryland. See Questions raised over high school rankings by Shenzhen Daily. E8xE8 (talk) 10:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Schools in India[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Schools in India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is currently only used on one article, but was only created a couple days ago. I think a category would be better. —PC-XT+ 07:34, 22 November 2014 (UTC) 07:48, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(It currently has no support for more than one small area of India, so if that functionality is not to be added, it should be renamed if kept.) —PC-XT+ 07:41, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MSU ISED – Science High School[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MSU ISED – Science High School (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is article content in template space. It is used in one article, where a navbox would go. (A navbox may have been the original intention.) I would support userfication or merging with an article, if appropriate. —PC-XT+ 07:18, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Audi Sport Team Joest driver timeline[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.