Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 June 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 13

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus, and the discussion has stagnated. Feel free to renominate it if you would still like to see it deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:58, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Science commemorative events (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Incoherent topic. Fails WP:NAVBOX. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clear Keep As creator, I don't understand how it fails WP:NAVBOX: These topics make sense together: they are events that are public-ally focused, and are meant to celebrate and commemorate scientific achievements. I don't understand how the topic is incoherent.Sadads (talk) 18:39, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't meet any of points 1-5. --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thats the thing: it meets all but #4 in my mind; you provide no explanation of how it doesn't meet 1-3. When I first created the navbox, most of them were linking to eachother in see also sections, so minimally the navbox meets 5. Cheers, Sadads (talk) 13:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:07, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:18, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Large metropolitan area roads templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Metro Detroit Freeways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Denver highways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Atlanta expressways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Baltimore Metropolitan Area Roads (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Boston Road Transportation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Chicagoland expressways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cleveland freeways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These templates should be deleted because they are not necessary in articles—Categories are sufficient for organizing these links—and because they cause problems with tracking what pages link where. Many of these templates have been deleted recently, starting with the Valdosta precedent, since confirmed here, here, here, here, and here.  V 01:37, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was already merged by nomPlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox tennis player season 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox tennis player season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox tennis player season 2 with Template:Infobox tennis player season.
Gender fork; Davis/Fed Cup can simply be made a switch. Alakzi (talk) 01:42, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.