Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 November 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 29[edit]

Atlantic hurricane season storm ToC[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete all. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All listed entries are redundant to both the main ToC standard with every Wiki article and the WP:WPTC season button bar (ex: Template:2002 Atlantic hurricane season buttons) at the bottom of the articles. They're only used in recent hurricane seasons and appear to be a leftover theme from the 2005 hurricane season. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 07:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - since they are redundant and not done in any other basin with one or two exceptions....Jason Rees (talk) 14:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete them all. We don't need them and don't use them. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 16:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CircleBig[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unused templates created by a user with very few contributions to the project, and obsessed with violating WP:SIGNT (see the history for Template:Quackers). Frietjes (talk) 14:25, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 05:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is this currently being used for any purpose? smileguy91talk - contribs 05:40, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
no, which is why I said "unused". Frietjes (talk) 16:57, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).