Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 January 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 5

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst 01:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template denoting non-notable subject. Jweiss11 (talk) 20:54, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 00:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox for band deleted at AFD. All recordings listed have been deleted or are in PROD. David Gerard (talk) 16:41, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 13Primefac (talk) 20:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is sub template for {{Nandi Award for Best Actor}} and is redundant. The above template contains ALL awardees and has been used to replace this template on all peritnent articles. Agrawal.akshay98 (talk) 11:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 13Primefac (talk) 20:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is sub template for {{Nandi Award for Best Actor}} and is redundant. The above template contains ALL awardees and has been used to replace this template on all peritnent articles. Agrawal.akshay98 (talk) 11:35, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 13Primefac (talk) 20:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is sub template for {{Nandi Award for Best Actor}} and is redundant. The above template contains ALL awardees and has been used to replace this template on all peritnent articles. Agrawal.akshay98 (talk) 11:35, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 13Primefac (talk) 20:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nivas88 09:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

@Frietjes Yes I nominate/request this template for deletion. Nivas88 17:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst 01:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Each of these are used in only one article, and therefore links to nothing since the only link is for the article in which they are transcluded. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:47, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).