Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 June 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to a subpage. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 15:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. The page states "This template has the same functionality as the magic word {{Template:!}}, but it is not a magic word." If it has the same function, then there is no need for this template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:48, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not. No ping wikilink is linked on the !unmagic template page. Not used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:05, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiCleanerMan: look at the source code of the template. That template would not function should this template be deleted. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:06, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Safesubst. That's the link to the template you're citing. And it's used twice on the page for No ping wikilink. But again, the function of the template at hand for discussion is not used anywhere. If !unmagic's function is the same as, Template:!, then why can't Template:! be used as a Safesubst? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WikiCleanerMan because it won't work - a limit of parser functions. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Elli, I'll withdraw the nomination if you can provide an example of the potential risks of deleting this template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiCleanerMan: I just did? If you try replacing !unmagic with just ! in the template I linked, it does not work. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:47, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see. But aren't there other places in which the template can be used? To have it one page seems pointless, hence why I nominated it. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:04, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:02, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, not sure if was used. Gonnym (talk) 15:13, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:02, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and won't be used as List of regions of Hungary uses {{Hungary regions imagemap 550}}. Gonnym (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and won't be used as Counties of Hungary uses {{Hungary counties imagemep 450}} Gonnym (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, not clear where this would be useful. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hamilton Municipal Election, 2003 templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused now that they have been substituted into 2003 Hamilton, Ontario municipal election and unlikely to be useful elsewhere. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Thank you for logging this. I aim to convert all the Hamilton tables into more simple ones, so these can be removed. I appreciate your work on this. HamOntPoliFiend (talk) 17:34, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 June 15. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:58, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template, functionality is covered through Template:escyr. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 12:57, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused - slightly different version with the same information is directly subst in 1949 West German federal election. Elli (talk | contribs) 00:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).