Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 May 15
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Banner holder. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Translation attribution shell (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Banner holder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Translation attribution shell with Template:Banner holder.
Specialist template for which we have a more-general, more-widely-used template. Izno (talk) 17:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Makes sense; support. Mathglot (talk) 17:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support, a single template is preferable because it's much easier to remember. However, it would be useful to have that version of the translation version available via some parameter (e.g.
|translation=yes
, or if there are more versions that would be useful to have options for,|version=translation
), rather than people needing to set up all of the text etc manually and reducing consistency across pages. --Xurizuri (talk) 00:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)- I'll just respond in the one spot; I don't think we should generally support ad hoc parameters like that one. At the end of the day, the templates which go into {{Translation attribution shell}} are just more banners. If users really think it's critical to indicate what kinds of banners, that should be a specific talk page discussion/consensus to deviate from the generic. Izno (talk) 01:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. The translation attribution shell serves a unique purpose of holding attribution that the article has been translated. The translation version should be preserved; attribution of translations is important to be visible on the page. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 17:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support on the condition that the above-mentioned translation parameter is available for the proper attribution of translations. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support for the obvious reasons already listed. And honestly, Speedy Support because it's so frustrating to see this "templates for discussion" banner all over the wiki everywhere this is used, every time some specialist template crops up. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 23:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, this template has never been used in {{No More Links}} (I checked every diff since this template's creation). We used to use {{Z148}} as a tracking template there, but those templates were removed. I don't see the name of this template anywhere on en.WP except for unused template reports. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Content merged with only article using the template: 2015 Southeast Asian Games, leaving this template unused. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - no use as stated in nom. Duonaut (talk | contribs) 04:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).