Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rock music

Welcome to the discussion page of the Rock music WikiProject and all its taskforces!

WikiProject Rock music was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 26 March 2012.

Proposed deletion of Hang Your Cross

The article Hang Your Cross has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Peel Sessions

Hi, I'm looking at an AfC draft (Draft:Restricted Code), the notability of which may hinge on whether being featured on BBC's Peel Sessions is enough to satisfy WP:BAND #12 — any views on that? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It needs better references, in my view Atlantic306 (talk) 18:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"New Wave Yacht Rock"

Is this a thing? The List of yacht rock artists article divides the list into classic and new wave yacht rock artists, and includes Fleetwood Mac and The Eagles in the latter category.

Does this make any sense to anybody? I'm old enough to remember when New Wave Music was new (early 80s) and it makes no sense to me. A brief search turns up basically nothing other than one article that uses the term rather loosely. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 19:45, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Bigbang (Norwegian band)#Requested move 16 February 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Bigbang (Norwegian band)#Requested move 16 February 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 2pou (talk) 21:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Sex Pistols

I have nominated Sex Pistols for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 00:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute about the term underground for NWOBHM bands

A dispute arose on Talk:New wave of British heavy metal about the use of the term underground associated with a few British bands, which had limited notoriety and chart success during the New wave of British heavy metal of the 80s. Comments and contributions to the stalled debate would be much appreciated. Lewismaster (talk) 19:37, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mixed-gender band

I have just started a draft for mixed-gender bands, and could use some input into which ones are most significant, and sources for trends in composition and success. Cheers! BD2412 T 05:30, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have promoted Mixed-gender band, but it could certainly still use some expansion. BD2412 T 03:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Foals (band) a British or English band?

Hello there. I have started a discussion for the article Foals (band) on their origin, and there is a bit of edit warring from an IP regarding the lead section on whether the band is British or if they are English. I have started a discussion on the article's talk page for this thread: Talk:Foals (band)#British or English?. I would like to see some discussion to see if a consensus could be reached on whether they are British or English. The categories say they are an English band, but IP (who refuses to communicate in talk discussion) persists that it is a British band via their edit summaries. So far, there's been no communication from the IP and users I have pinged. Also, adding this to other related WikiProject talk pages for their input. HorrorLover555 (talk) 16:29, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm having similar issues with Deep Purple which formed as Roundabout in London in 1967. An IP keeps reverting my edits without discussion and despite my sources.

Anyway, Foals were formed in Oxford in England, and therefore they are an English band - simple as that! They could be considered British generally, but specifically when referring to country of origin, it is England and therefore they're English. I am English, and we would certainly not say British. Hope that helps Deep Purple Fan (talk) 21:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whitesnake

Needed opinion at Talk:Whitesnake#Lead and else about mentioning "Love Ain't No Stranger" in the lead, and at Talk:Whitesnake#Lead and else#Quote about including a quote/quote box about 2003 live performance. Miki Filigranski (talk) 09:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rush (band) regarding end of band

There is a discussion on the article's talk page regarding the band either ending in 2015 or 2018. Some opinions would be helpful to see if a full consensus can be given. The topic is Talk:Rush (band)#Lifeson confirming 2015 end. Thanks. HorrorLover555 (talk) 20:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Death on Two Legs (Dedicated to...)#Requested move 7 December 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Death on Two Legs (Dedicated to...)#Requested move 7 December 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 12:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for It's All Coming Back to Me Now

It's All Coming Back to Me Now has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 09:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Purple origin discussion/edit wars

Ok, hopefully i can get some clarity or discussion from here. There has been an edit war between myself and an IP address constantly changing the origin of Deep Purple, as in the place where they started. In the book, Deep Purple: A Matter of Fact by Jerry Bloom https://www.wymeruk.co.uk/webshop/books/rock/deep-purple/deep-purple-a-matter-of-fact-jerry-bloom/ It is pointed out that the band forming in Hertford, Hertfordshire is an urban myth. Sources cite that the band's origin begins in 1967 as Roundabout in Jon Lord's flat in Kensington, London. The MK1 line-up came together at Deeves Hall, South Mimms in Hertfordshire near the M25, about 15 miles away from Hertford. MK2 classic line-up came together in Ealing, West London in 1969. The band's origin starts in London in 1967, not Hertford, not were the band ever based there. Yes, there are sources that state the band formed in Hertford, but all of them are news articles that have copied information directly from the main Wikipedia entry, which leads to question the reliability of said source? My issue is that every time I add London as an origin of Deep Purple in 1967 where Lord, Blackmore and Paice came together, it is instantly reverted back to Hertford, despite adding several sources. I am following protocol and have requested it be discussed on the Deep Purple Tak section, but no luck. Where do I stand, can anyone back me up or at least help me find a common ground where I can include London as a place of origin? What is considered a reliable source anyway, if newspaper or blog articles can be used that have copied and pasted info direct from Wiki which is then used as a source to back it up? My intention is not to add erroneous information, but to add London as a place of origin for the band, which is cited by several sources. Deep Purple Fan (talk) 21:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for TISM

TISM has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting feedback for proposed Hard Rock Cafe changes

Hello! Matthew here on behalf of Seminole Hard Rock Support Services at Hard Rock International. I'm here on Wikipedia to suggest updates and other improvements to pages about the company and executive leadership.

I am concerned about the current state of the Hard Rock Cafe article, which should be focused on the restaurant chain but has a significant amount of information about the parent company as well as the Seminole Tribe of Florida and Hard Rock's hotel and casino properties. I've proposed some structural changes here, in an attempt to separate text about the restaurant chain from text about the company's hotels and casinos.

Some of the changes are specifically related to Hard Rock International's music memorabilia collection (which is not specific to the restaurant brand), so I am hoping some members of this WikiProject can take a look.

Thanks, MattHardRockInt (talk) 17:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:The Truth About Love (Pink album)#Requested move 25 July 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:The Truth About Love (Pink album)#Requested move 25 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Arthur (Or the Decline and Fall of the British Empire)

I have nominated Arthur (Or the Decline and Fall of the British Empire) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 20:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Tyla (English musician)#Requested Move on 5 September 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Tyla (English musician)#Requested Move on 5 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Public Service Announcement (disambiguation)#Requested move 27 September 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Public Service Announcement (disambiguation)#Requested move 27 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 18:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Aerosmith

Aerosmith has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]